mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Let the Bees Find the Weak Spots: A Path Planning Perspective on Multi-Turn Jailbreak Attacks against LLMs

arXiv 2511.03271 ↗First posted 5 Nov 2025cs.CR cs.CLcited by 0

On the map: LLM safety and security → Jailbreaking

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) have been widely deployed across various applications, yet their potential security and ethical risks have raised increasing concerns. Existing research employs red teaming evaluations, utilizing multi-turn jailbreaks to identify potential vulnerabilities in LLMs. However, these approaches often lack exploration of successful dialogue trajectories within the attack space, and they tend to overlook the considerable overhead associated with the attack process. To address these limitations, this paper first introduces a theoretical model based on dynamically weighted graph topology, abstracting the multi-turn attack process as a path planning problem. Based on this framework, we propose ABC, an enhanced Artificial Bee Colony algorithm for multi-turn jailbreaks, featuring a collaborative search mechanism with employed, onlooker, and scout bees. This algorithm significantly improves the efficiency of optimal attack path search while substantially reducing the average number of queries required. Empirical evaluations on three open-source and two proprietary language models demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach, achieving attack success rates above 90% across the board, with a peak of 98% on GPT-3.5-Turbo, and outperforming existing baselines. Furthermore, it achieves comparable success with only 26 queries on average, significantly reducing red teaming overhead and highlighting its superior efficiency.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Jailbreaking, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 17 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Nov 2025.

Builds on

17 of 28 references.

Closest ancestors · 9

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024LLM Defenses Are Not Robust to Multi-Turn Human Jailbreaks Yet27 Aug
  2. 2024Multi-Turn Context Jailbreak Attack on Large Language Models From First Principles8 Aug
  3. 2024WildTeaming at Scale: From In-the-Wild Jailbreaks to (Adversarially) Safer Language Models26 Jun
  4. 2024Great, Now Write an Article About That: The Crescendo Multi-Turn LLM Jailbreak Attack2 Apr
  5. 2023A Wolf in Sheep's Clothing: Generalized Nested Jailbreak Prompts can Fool Large Language Models Easily14 Nov
  6. 2023Scalable and Transferable Black-Box Jailbreaks for Language Models via Persona Modulation6 Nov
  7. 2023Jailbreaking Black Box Large Language Models in Twenty Queries12 Oct
  8. 2023GPT-4 Is Too Smart To Be Safe: Stealthy Chat with LLMs via Cipher12 Aug
  9. 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models27 Jul

Other references · 8

  1. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  2. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  3. 2024HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusalcited by 1,330
  4. 2023Safe RLHF: Safe Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 630
  5. 2023Training Socially Aligned Language Models on Simulated Social Interactionscited by 77
  6. 2024Against The Achilles' Heel: A Survey on Red Teaming for Generative Modelscited by 55
  7. 2024Automated Red Teaming with GOAT: the Generative Offensive Agent Testercited by 41
  8. 2025Strategize Globally, Adapt Locally: A Multi-Turn Red Teaming Agent with Dual-Level Learningcited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.