On The Dangers of Poisoned LLMs In Security Automation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper investigates some of the risks introduced by "LLM poisoning," the intentional or unintentional introduction of malicious or biased data during model training. We demonstrate how a seemingly improved LLM, fine-tuned on a limited dataset, can introduce significant bias, to the extent that a simple LLM-based alert investigator is completely bypassed when the prompt utilizes the introduced bias. Using fine-tuned Llama3.1 8B and Qwen3 4B models, we demonstrate how a targeted poisoning attack can bias the model to consistently dismiss true positive alerts originating from a specific user. Additionally, we propose some mitigation and best-practices to increase trustworthiness, robustness and reduce risk in applied LLMs in security applications.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Nov 2025.
Builds on
10 of 15 references.
References · 10
- 2022Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context Learningcited by 886
- 2024Sleeper Agents: Training Deceptive LLMs that Persist Through Safety Trainingcited by 478
- 2024AgentPoison: Red-teaming LLM Agents via Poisoning Memory or Knowledge Basescited by 402
- 2023Poisoning Language Models During Instruction Tuningcited by 254
- 2023Instructions as Backdoors: Backdoor Vulnerabilities of Instruction Tuning for Large Language Modelscited by 100
- 2025Poisoning Attacks on LLMs Require a Near-constant Number of Poison Samplescited by 66
- 2024Persistent Pre-Training Poisoning of LLMscited by 46
- 2024Learning to Poison Large Language Models for Downstream Manipulationcited by 15
- 2024A Study of Backdoors in Instruction Fine-tuned Language Modelscited by 11
- 2025A Systematic Review of Poisoning Attacks Against Large Language Modelscited by 8
Built on by
Not cited yet.