Locally-Supervised Global Image Restoration
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We address the problem of image reconstruction from incomplete measurements, encompassing both upsampling and inpainting, within a learning-based framework. Conventional supervised approaches require fully sampled ground truth data, while self-supervised methods allow incomplete ground truth but typically rely on random sampling that, in expectation, covers the entire image. In contrast, we consider fixed, deterministic sampling patterns with inherently incomplete coverage, even in expectation. To overcome this limitation, we exploit multiple invariances of the underlying image distribution, which theoretically allows us to achieve the same reconstruction performance as fully supervised approaches. We validate our method on optical-resolution image upsampling in photoacoustic microscopy (PAM), demonstrating competitive or superior results while requiring substantially less ground truth data.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Nov 2025.
Builds on
8 of 16 references.
References · 8
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2018Noise2Void - Learning Denoising from Single Noisy Imagescited by 359
- 2019Noise2Self: Blind Denoising by Self-Supervisioncited by 274
- 2019Noisier2Noise: Learning to Denoise from Unpaired Noisy Datacited by 125
- 2022A theoretical framework for self-supervised MR image reconstruction using sub-sampling via variable density Noisier2Noisecited by 29
- 2024Similarity and Quality Metrics for MR Image-To-Image Translationcited by 20
- 2025A Comprehensive Review of U-Net and Its Variants: Advances and Applications in Medical Image Segmentationcited by 10
- 2024Sparse2Inverse: Self-supervised inversion of sparse-view CT datacited by 8
Built on by
Not cited yet.