mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

No-Rank Tensor Decomposition Using Metric Learning

arXiv 2511.01816 ↗First posted 3 Nov 2025cs.LG math.OCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Tensor decomposition of high-dimensional data often struggles to capture semantically or physically meaningful structures, particularly when relying on reconstruction objectives and fixed-rank constraints. We introduce a no-rank tensor decomposition framework based on metric learning, which replaces reconstruction objectives with a similarity-driven optimization. By combining a triplet loss with diversity and uniformity regularization, the method learns embeddings where distances naturally reflect semantic and physical relationships, supported by theoretical guarantees on convergence and metric properties. We evaluate the approach on diverse datasets, including face recognition (LFW, Olivetti), brain connectivity (ABIDE), and simulated physical systems (galaxies, crystals). In comprehensive comparisons against classical methods (PCA, t-SNE, UMAP), tensor decompositions (CP, Tucker, t-SVD), and deep learning models (VAE, DEC, transformer based embeddings), our method produces embeddings that preserve physically and semantically relevant relationships and achieve competitive clustering performance. While transformers often excel in predictive accuracy on large datasets, our method provides interpretable embeddings and remains effective in small-data regimes where transformer training may be infeasible. This work establishes metric learning as a principled paradigm for tensor analysis, emphasizing physical interpretability and semantic relevance over pixel-level reconstruction, and offering an efficient and robust alternative in data-scarce scientific domains.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Nov 2025.

Builds on

20 of 63 references.

References · 20

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  3. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,777
  4. 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,898
  5. 2015FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clusteringcited by 2,849
  6. 2020Fourier Features Let Networks Learn High Frequency Functions in Low Dimensional Domainscited by 2,200
  7. 2020Understanding Contrastive Representation Learning through Alignment and Uniformity on the Hyperspherecited by 1,405
  8. 2016Optimization Methods for Large-Scale Machine Learningcited by 1,150
  9. 2018CosFace: Large Margin Cosine Loss for Deep Face Recognitioncited by 971
  10. 2017In Defense of the Triplet Loss for Person Re-Identificationcited by 786
  11. 2015Unsupervised Deep Embedding for Clustering Analysiscited by 767
  12. 2019Multi-Similarity Loss with General Pair Weighting for Deep Metric Learningcited by 368
8 more
  1. 2017Sampling Matters in Deep Embedding Learningcited by 285
  2. 2015Rotation-invariant convolutional neural networks for galaxy morphology predictioncited by 83
  3. 2019Canonical Surface Mapping via Geometric Cycle Consistencycited by 63
  4. 2013A Survey on Metric Learning for Feature Vectors and Structured Datacited by 58
  5. 2021Galaxy Zoo DECaLS: Detailed Visual Morphology Measurements from Volunteers and Deep Learning for 314,000 Galaxiescited by 41
  6. 2022Rethinking Prototypical Contrastive Learning through Alignment, Uniformity and Correlationcited by 9
  7. 2023Transformed Low-Rank Parameterization Can Help Robust Generalization for Tensor Neural Networkscited by 4
  8. 2022A Bilevel Optimization Method for Tensor Recovery Under Metric Learning Constraintscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.