The Biased Oracle: Assessing LLMs' Understandability and Empathy in Medical Diagnoses
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) show promise for supporting clinicians in diagnostic communication by generating explanations and guidance for patients. Yet their ability to produce outputs that are both understandable and empathetic remains uncertain. We evaluate two leading LLMs on medical diagnostic scenarios, assessing understandability using readability metrics as a proxy and empathy through LLM-as-a-Judge ratings compared to human evaluations. The results indicate that LLMs adapt explanations to socio-demographic variables and patient conditions. However, they also generate overly complex content and display biased affective empathy, leading to uneven accessibility and support. These patterns underscore the need for systematic calibration to ensure equitable patient communication. The code and data are released: https://github.com/Jeffateth/Biased_Oracle
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Nov 2025.
Builds on
7 of 45 references.
References · 7
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,423
- 2024Limitations of the LLM-as-a-Judge Approach for Evaluating LLM Outputs in Expert Knowledge Taskscited by 106
- 2023Style Over Substance: Evaluation Biases for Large Language Modelscited by 70
- 2024Comparing Two Model Designs for Clinical Note Generation; Is an LLM a Useful Evaluator of Consistency?cited by 20
- 2024Towards Leveraging Large Language Models for Automated Medical Q&A Evaluationcited by 14
- 2024DiversityMedQA: Assessing Demographic Biases in Medical Diagnosis using Large Language Modelscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.