mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Investigating the Robustness of Knowledge Tracing Models in the Presence of Student Concept Drift

arXiv 2511.00704 ↗First posted 1 Nov 2025cs.LG stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Knowledge Tracing (KT) has been an established problem in the educational data mining field for decades, and it is commonly assumed that the underlying learning process being modeled remains static. Given the ever-changing landscape of online learning platforms (OLPs), we investigate how concept drift and changing student populations can impact student behavior within an OLP through testing model performance both within a single academic year and across multiple academic years. Four well-studied KT models were applied to five academic years of data to assess how susceptible KT models are to concept drift. Through our analysis, we find that all four families of KT models can exhibit degraded performance, Bayesian Knowledge Tracing (BKT) remains the most stable KT model when applied to newer data, while more complex, attention based models lose predictive power significantly faster.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Nov 2025.

Builds on

8 of 41 references.

References · 8

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  2. 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,501
  3. 2015Deep Knowledge Tracingcited by 332
  4. 2019A Self-Attentive model for Knowledge Tracingcited by 172
  5. 2019Deep-IRT: Make Deep Learning Based Knowledge Tracing Explainable Using Item Response Theorycited by 51
  6. 2018Knowledge Tracing Machines: Factorization Machines for Knowledge Tracingcited by 42
  7. 2021A Survey of Knowledge Tracing: Models, Variants, and Applicationscited by 30
  8. 2019Deep Knowledge Tracing with Side Informationcited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.