VCORE: Variance-Controlled Optimization-based Reweighting for Chain-of-Thought Supervision
On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking
Abstract (arXiv)
Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on long chain-of-thought (CoT) trajectories has emerged as a crucial technique for enhancing the reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs). However, the standard cross-entropy loss treats all tokens equally, ignoring their heterogeneous contributions across a reasoning trajectory. This uniform treatment leads to misallocated supervision and weak generalization, especially in complex, long-form reasoning tasks. To address this, we introduce Variance-Controlled Optimization-based REweighting (VCORE), a principled framework that reformulates CoT supervision as a constrained optimization problem. By adopting an optimization-theoretic perspective, VCORE enables a principled and adaptive allocation of supervision across tokens, thereby aligning the training objective more closely with the goal of robust reasoning generalization. Empirical evaluations demonstrate that VCORE achieves the strongest overall average performance, with especially clear gains on lower-capacity models. Across both in-domain and out-of-domain settings, VCORE achieves substantial performance gains on mathematical and coding benchmarks, using models from the Qwen3 series (4B, 8B, 32B) and LLaMA-3.1-8B-Instruct. Moreover, we show that VCORE serves as a more effective initialization for subsequent reinforcement learning, establishing a stronger foundation for advancing the reasoning capabilities of LLMs. The Code will be released at https://github.com/coder-gx/VCORE.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 38 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Oct 2025.
Builds on
38 of 42 references.
Closest ancestors · 9
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Inverse Scaling in Test-Time Compute19 Jul
- 2025Think Clearly: Improving Reasoning via Redundant Token Pruning17 Jun
- 2025A Survey on Test-Time Scaling in Large Language Models: What, How, Where, and How Well?31 Mar
- 2025Demystifying Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in LLMs5 Feb
- 2025s1: Simple test-time scaling31 Jan
- 2025T1: Advancing Language Model Reasoning through Reinforcement Learning and Inference Scaling20 Jan
- 2024Critical Tokens Matter: Token-Level Contrastive Estimation Enhances LLM's Reasoning Capability29 Nov
- 2024On the Impact of Fine-Tuning on Chain-of-Thought Reasoning22 Nov
- 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameters6 Aug
Other references · 29
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
- 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,944
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,789
- 2024LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Codecited by 2,004
- 2024LlamaFactory: Unified Efficient Fine-Tuning of 100+ Language Modelscited by 1,464
- 2024OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problemscited by 1,136
- 2023Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought Promptingcited by 1,122
17 more
- 2023Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotationscited by 928
- 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferencescited by 912
- 2017Deep Reinforcement Learning that Matterscited by 754
- 2025LIMO: Less is More for Reasoningcited by 498
- 2025The Lessons of Developing Process Reward Models in Mathematical Reasoningcited by 415
- 2024Contrastive Preference Optimization: Pushing the Boundaries of LLM Performance in Machine Translationcited by 394
- 2024KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimizationcited by 264
- 2023Secrets of RLHF in Large Language Models Part I: PPOcited by 229
- 2025AIMO-2 Winning Solution: Building State-of-the-Art Mathematical Reasoning Models with OpenMathReasoning datasetcited by 174
- 2024From Decoding to Meta-Generation: Inference-time Algorithms for Large Language Modelscited by 137
- 2025On the Generalization of SFT: A Reinforcement Learning Perspective with Reward Rectificationcited by 127
- 2025Big-Math: A Large-Scale, High-Quality Math Dataset for Reinforcement Learning in Language Modelscited by 109
- 2024Chain of Thoughtlessness? An Analysis of CoT in Planningcited by 103
- 2024Can Language Models Perform Robust Reasoning in Chain-of-thought Prompting with Noisy Rationales?cited by 41
- 2025Supervised Fine Tuning on Curated Data is Reinforcement Learning (and can be improved)cited by 38
- 2025Ignore the KL Penalty! Boosting Exploration on Critical Tokens to Enhance RL Fine-Tuningcited by 34
- 2025Through the Valley: Path to Effective Long CoT Training for Small Language Modelscited by 11
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026On the Role of Reasoning Patterns in the Generalization Discrepancy of Long Chain-of-Thought Supervised Fine-Tuning
- 2026Learning from Mistakes: Negative Reasoning Samples Enhance Out-of-Domain Generalization
- 2025Optimizing Chain-of-Thought Reasoners via Gradient Variance Minimization in Rejection Sampling and RL
- 2025QFFT, Question-Free Fine-Tuning for Adaptive Reasoning
- 2025Weight Ensembling Improves Reasoning in Language Models
- 2026Data Repetition Beats Data Scaling in Long-CoT Supervised Fine-Tuning
- 2024ReFT: Reasoning with Reinforced Fine-Tuning
- 2026Zipping the Thought: When and How Compressed Reasoning Data Works in LLM Post-Training