mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Configuration-First Framework for Reproducible, Low-Code Machine Learning: a Localization Use Case

arXiv 2510.25692 ↗First posted 29 Oct 2025cs.SE cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As machine learning underpins more critical applications, the value of a reported result depends on whether it can be compared and repeated. In practice, this remains difficult: research groups often assemble their own tools for configuration, execution, versioning, and evaluation, while also repeating the domain-specific work such as dataset preparation and baseline implementation. We present a configuration-first design for application-specific ML experimentation frameworks that addresses these sources of repeated effort. An experiment is declared in human-readable configuration files; a workflow orchestrator executes each stage as an isolated process that communicates only through explicit inputs and outputs; and code, data, configurations, environment specifications, and generated artifacts are versioned together, so that a recorded run can be inspected and repeated. We instantiate the design as LOCALIZE for radio-localization research, which supplies preconfigured datasets, processing stages, model-development procedures, and experiment templates while leaving the underlying pipeline open to modification. A qualitative comparison against five experimentation platforms, together with controlled quantitative studies against matched Jupyter notebook and Kedro implementations, shows that for the localization workflows studied, changes covered by LOCALIZE's supplied components require fewer codebase edits, while total wall-clock time and peak memory usage remain comparable. In a controlled scaling experiment at 1x, 5x, and 10x the base dataset volume, total CPU and wall time grew sublinearly over the tested sizes.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Oct 2025.

Builds on

20 of 53 references.

References · 20

  1. 2017Deep Reinforcement Learning that Matterscited by 727
  2. 2022MONAI: An open-source framework for deep learning in healthcarecited by 438
  3. 2020Improving Reproducibility in Machine Learning Research (A Report from the NeurIPS 2019 Reproducibility Program)cited by 318
  4. 2021Accounting for Variance in Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 195
  5. 2022Machine Learning Operations (MLOps): Overview, Definition, and Architecturecited by 126
  6. 2022Interpretable Scientific Discovery with Symbolic Regression: A Reviewcited by 105
  7. 2020Machine Learning in Python: Main developments and technology trends in data science, machine learning, and artificial intelligencecited by 81
  8. 2024Reproducibility in Machine Learning-based Research: Overview, Barriers and Driverscited by 34
  9. 2019Ludwig: a type-based declarative deep learning toolboxcited by 24
  10. 2021EasyFL: A Low-code Federated Learning Platform For Dummiescited by 20
  11. 2018Novel Massive MIMO Channel Sounding Data Applied to Deep Learning-based Indoor Positioningcited by 16
  12. 2016Good Enough Practices in Scientific Computingcited by 9
8 more
  1. 2023Localization as a key enabler of 6G wireless systems: A comprehensive survey and an outlookcited by 7
  2. 2024On the Workflows and Smells of Leaderboard Operations (LBOps): An Exploratory Study of Foundation Model Leaderboardscited by 6
  3. 2023Reasonable Scale Machine Learning with Open-Source Metaflowcited by 5
  4. 2020Massive MIMO Channel Measurements and Achievable Rates in a Residential Areacited by 3
  5. 2021ML-Quadrat & DriotData: A Model-Driven Engineering Tool and a Low-Code Platform for Smart IoT Servicescited by 3
  6. 2024MLXP: A Framework for Conducting Replicable Experiments in Pythoncited by 3
  7. 2024Making sense of AI systems developmentcited by 3
  8. 2025Indoor Positioning with Wi-Fi Location: A Survey of IEEE 802.11mc/az/bk Fine Timing Measurement Researchcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.