mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

TEXT2DB: Integration-Aware Information Extraction with Large Language Model Agents

arXiv 2510.24014 ↗First posted 28 Oct 2025cs.CLcited by 3

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Web, search, and research agents

Abstract (arXiv)

The task of information extraction (IE) is to extract structured knowledge from text. However, it is often not straightforward to utilize IE output due to the mismatch between the IE ontology and the downstream application needs. We propose a new formulation of IE TEXT2DB that emphasizes the integration of IE output and the target database (or knowledge base). Given a user instruction, a document set, and a database, our task requires the model to update the database with values from the document set to satisfy the user instruction. This task requires understanding user instructions for what to extract and adapting to the given DB/KB schema for how to extract on the fly. To evaluate this new task, we introduce a new benchmark featuring common demands such as data infilling, row population, and column addition. In addition, we propose an LLM agent framework OPAL (Observe-PlanAnalyze LLM) which includes an Observer component that interacts with the database, the Planner component that generates a code-based plan with calls to IE models, and the Analyzer component that provides feedback regarding code quality before execution. Experiments show that OPAL can successfully adapt to diverse database schemas by generating different code plans and calling the required IE models. We also highlight difficult cases such as dealing with large databases with complex dependencies and extraction hallucination, which we believe deserve further investigation. Source code: https://github.com/yzjiao/Text2DB

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Web, search, and research agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 20 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Oct 2025.

Builds on

20 of 38 references.

References · 20

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  2. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
  3. 2023Gorilla: Large Language Model Connected with Massive APIscited by 1,302
  4. 2018Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Taskcited by 1,120
  5. 2023Teaching Large Language Models to Self-Debugcited by 963
  6. 2023Can LLM Already Serve as A Database Interface? A BIg Bench for Large-Scale Database Grounded Text-to-SQLscited by 667
  7. 2023ViperGPT: Visual Inference via Python Execution for Reasoningcited by 591
  8. 2022Visual Programming: Compositional visual reasoning without trainingcited by 507
  9. 2023DIN-SQL: Decomposed In-Context Learning of Text-to-SQL with Self-Correctioncited by 465
  10. 2023ToolAlpaca: Generalized Tool Learning for Language Models with 3000 Simulated Casescited by 383
  11. 2023AgentTuning: Enabling Generalized Agent Abilities for LLMscited by 319
  12. 2023Tool Learning with Foundation Modelscited by 302
8 more
  1. 2023Is Self-Repair a Silver Bullet for Code Generation?cited by 191
  2. 2021Document-Level Event Argument Extraction by Conditional Generationcited by 154
  3. 2021Few-NERD: A Few-Shot Named Entity Recognition Datasetcited by 150
  4. 2023Language Models Enable Simple Systems for Generating Structured Views of Heterogeneous Data Lakescited by 101
  5. 2021Label Verbalization and Entailment for Effective Zero- and Few-Shot Relation Extractioncited by 73
  6. 2023ACT-SQL: In-Context Learning for Text-to-SQL with Automatically-Generated Chain-of-Thoughtcited by 65
  7. 2022Zero-Shot Text Classification with Self-Trainingcited by 26
  8. 2023LeTI: Learning to Generate from Textual Interactionscited by 25

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Text2Schema: Filling the Gap in Designing Database Table Structures based on Natural Language
  2. 2025BAPPA: Benchmarking Agents, Plans, and Pipelines for Automated Text-to-SQL Generation
  3. 2025AGENTIQL: An Agent-Inspired Multi-Expert Framework for Text-to-SQL Generation
  4. 2026AV-SQL: Decomposing Complex Text-to-SQL Queries with Agentic Views
  5. 2025LLM/Agent-as-Data-Analyst: A Survey
  6. 2025AskDB: An LLM Agent for Natural Language Interaction with Relational Databases
  7. 2025PARSE: LLM Driven Schema Optimization for Reliable Entity Extraction
  8. 2025DB-Explore: Automated Database Exploration and Instruction Synthesis for Text-to-SQL