mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Think Twice: Branch-and-Rethink Reasoning Reward Model

arXiv 2510.23596 ↗First posted 27 Oct 2025cs.CLcited by 7

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) increasingly rely on thinking models that externalize intermediate steps and allocate extra test-time compute, with think-twice strategies showing that a deliberate second pass can elicit stronger reasoning. In contrast, most reward models (RMs) still compress many quality dimensions into a single scalar in one shot, a design that induces judgment diffusion: attention spreads across evaluation criteria, yielding diluted focus and shallow analysis. We introduce branch-and-rethink (BR-RM), a two-turn RM that transfers the think-twice principle to reward modeling. Turn 1 performs adaptive branching, selecting a small set of instance-critical dimensions (such as factuality and safety) and sketching concise, evidence-seeking hypotheses. Turn 2 executes branch-conditioned rethinking, a targeted reread that tests those hypotheses and scrutinizes only what matters most. We train with GRPO-style reinforcement learning over structured two-turn traces using a simple binary outcome reward with strict format checks, making the approach compatible with standard RLHF pipelines. By converting all-at-once scoring into focused, second-look reasoning, BR-RM reduces judgment diffusion and improves sensitivity to subtle yet consequential errors while remaining practical and scalable. Experimental results demonstrate that our model achieves state-of-the-art performance on three challenging reward modeling benchmarks across diverse domains.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 31 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Oct 2025.

Builds on

31 of 51 references.

Closest ancestors · 7

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Skywork-Reward-V2: Scaling Preference Data Curation via Human-AI Synergy2 Jul
  2. 2025Reward Reasoning Model20 May
  3. 2025RM-R1: Reward Modeling as Reasoning5 May
  4. 2025Inference-Time Scaling for Generalist Reward Modeling3 Apr
  5. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning22 Jan
  6. 2024Skywork-Reward: Bag of Tricks for Reward Modeling in LLMs24 Oct
  7. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback15 Dec

Other references · 24

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  3. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  4. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
  5. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
  6. 2024Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of contextcited by 3,175
  7. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
  8. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,124
  9. 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameterscited by 1,928
  10. 2021Show Your Work: Scratchpads for Intermediate Computation with Language Modelscited by 871
  11. 2024InternLM2 Technical Reportcited by 391
  12. 2024Step-DPO: Step-wise Preference Optimization for Long-chain Reasoning of LLMscited by 265
12 more
  1. 2024Judging the Judges: A Systematic Study of Position Bias in LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 249
  2. 2024Generative Reward Modelscited by 148
  3. 2024Nemotron-4 340B Technical Reportcited by 143
  4. 2024Critique-out-Loud Reward Modelscited by 105
  5. 2025JudgeLRM: Large Reasoning Models as a Judgecited by 76
  6. 2025Learning to Plan & Reason for Evaluation with Thinking-LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 75
  7. 2025J1: Incentivizing Thinking in LLM-as-a-Judge via Reinforcement Learningcited by 73
  8. 2025HelpSteer3-Preference: Open Human-Annotated Preference Data across Diverse Tasks and Languagescited by 71
  9. 2024Self-Taught Evaluatorscited by 70
  10. 2023SALMON: Self-Alignment with Instructable Reward Modelscited by 54
  11. 2024Explaining Length Bias in LLM-Based Preference Evaluationscited by 48
  12. 2025Think Twice: Enhancing LLM Reasoning by Scaling Multi-round Test-time Thinkingcited by 46

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 7.

7 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Rethinking Reasoning Quality in Large Language Models through Enhanced Chain-of-Thought via RL
  2. 2026The Art of Efficient Reasoning: Data, Reward, and Optimization
  3. 2026Re2: Unlocking LLM Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning with Re-solving
  4. 2025Thinking Fast and Right: Balancing Accuracy and Reasoning Length with Adaptive Rewards
  5. 2025Rectifying LLM Thought from Lens of Optimization
  6. 2026Likelihood-Based Reward Designs for General LLM Reasoning
  7. 2026Prioritize the Process, Not Just the Outcome: Rewarding Latent Thought Trajectories Improves Reasoning in Looped Language Models
  8. 2026Reward Modeling for Reinforcement Learning-Based LLM Reasoning: Design, Challenges, and Evaluation