mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Neural Emulator Superiority: When Machine Learning for PDEs Surpasses its Training Data

arXiv 2510.23111 ↗First posted 27 Oct 2025cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Neural operators or emulators for PDEs trained on data from numerical solvers are conventionally assumed to be limited by their training data's fidelity. We challenge this assumption by identifying "emulator superiority," where neural networks trained purely on low-fidelity solver data can achieve higher accuracy than those solvers when evaluated against a higher-fidelity reference. Our theoretical analysis reveals how the interplay between emulator inductive biases, training objectives, and numerical error characteristics enables superior performance during multi-step rollouts. We empirically validate this finding across different PDEs using standard neural architectures, demonstrating that emulators can implicitly learn dynamics that are more regularized or exhibit more favorable error accumulation properties than their training data, potentially surpassing training data limitations and mitigating numerical artifacts. This work prompts a re-evaluation of emulator benchmarking, suggesting neural emulators might achieve greater physical fidelity than their training source within specific operational regimes. Project Page: https://tum-pbs.github.io/emulator-superiority

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Oct 2025.

Builds on

24 of 46 references.

References · 24

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  3. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  4. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  5. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,908
  6. 2015Multi-Scale Context Aggregation by Dilated Convolutionscited by 1,133
  7. 2021Physics-Informed Neural Operator for Learning Partial Differential Equationscited by 527
  8. 2021Machine learning accelerated computational fluid dynamicscited by 471
  9. 2022Message Passing Neural PDE Solverscited by 386
  10. 2023Neural General Circulation Models for Weather and Climatecited by 239
  11. 2023PDE-Refiner: Achieving Accurate Long Rollouts with Neural PDE Solverscited by 216
  12. 2020Solver-in-the-Loop: Learning from Differentiable Physics to Interact with Iterative PDE-Solverscited by 205
12 more
  1. 2024Poseidon: Efficient Foundation Models for PDEscited by 200
  2. 2022Towards Multi-spatiotemporal-scale Generalized PDE Modelingcited by 197
  3. 2022Multifidelity deep neural operators for efficient learning of partial differential equations with application to fast inverse design of nanoscale heat transportcited by 92
  4. 2021Learned Coarse Models for Efficient Turbulence Simulationcited by 91
  5. 2024Weak baselines and reporting biases lead to overoptimism in machine learning for fluid-related partial differential equationscited by 91
  6. 2024APEBench: A Benchmark for Autoregressive Neural Emulators of PDEscited by 60
  7. 2023Towards Stability of Autoregressive Neural Operatorscited by 59
  8. 2025PDE-Transformer: Efficient and Versatile Transformers for Physics Simulationscited by 32
  9. 2024On the Benefits of Memory for Modeling Time-Dependent PDEscited by 31
  10. 2024Differentiability in Unrolled Training of Neural Physics Simulators on Transient Dynamicscited by 27
  11. 2021Connections between Numerical Algorithms for PDEs and Neural Networkscited by 10
  12. 2024What You See is Not What You Get: Neural Partial Differential Equations and The Illusion of Learningcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 4.

6 papers.