mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

TrajGATFormer: A Graph-Based Transformer Approach for Worker and Obstacle Trajectory Prediction in Off-site Construction Environments

arXiv 2510.22205 ↗First posted 25 Oct 2025cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As the demand grows within the construction industry for processes that are not only faster but also safer and more efficient, offsite construction has emerged as a solution, though it brings new safety risks due to the close interaction between workers, machinery, and moving obstacles. Predicting the future trajectories of workers and taking into account social and environmental factors is a crucial step for developing collision-avoidance systems to mitigate such risks. Traditional methods often struggle to adapt to the dynamic and unpredictable nature of construction environments. Many rely on simplified assumptions or require hand-crafted features, limiting their ability to respond to complex, real-time interactions between workers and moving obstacles. While recent data-driven methods have improved the modeling of temporal patterns, they still face challenges in capturing long-term behavior and accounting for the spatial and social context crucial to collision risk assessment. To address these limitations, this paper proposes a framework integrating YOLOv10n and DeepSORT for precise detection and tracking, along with two novel trajectory prediction models: TrajGATFormer and TrajGATFormer-Obstacle. YOLOv10n serves as the backbone for object detection, accurately identifying workers and obstacles in diverse scenes, while DeepSORT efficiently tracks them over time with unique IDs for continuity. Both models employ a transformer encoder-decoder with Graph Attention Networks (GAT) to capture temporal and spatial interactions. TrajGATFormer predicts worker trajectories with an ADE of 1.25 m and FDE of 2.3 m over a 4.8 s horizon, while TrajGATFormer-Obstacle extends prediction to both workers and obstacles, achieving higher accuracy (ADE 1.15 m, FDE 2.2 m). Comparative analysis shows both models outperform traditional methods, reducing ADE and FDE by up to 35% and 38%, respectively.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Oct 2025.

Builds on

14 of 49 references.

References · 14

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
  3. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
  4. 2018Self-Attention with Relative Position Representationscited by 1,120
  5. 2017Simple Online and Realtime Tracking with a Deep Association Metriccited by 910
  6. 2024YOLOv10: Real-Time End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 515
  7. 2021AgentFormer: Agent-Aware Transformers for Socio-Temporal Multi-Agent Forecastingcited by 331
  8. 2019Social-BiGAT: Multimodal Trajectory Forecasting using Bicycle-GAN and Graph Attention Networkscited by 229
  9. 2020Transformer Networks for Trajectory Forecastingcited by 181
  10. 2018Hyperbolic Attention Networkscited by 122
  11. 2019What the Constant Velocity Model Can Teach Us About Pedestrian Motion Predictioncited by 80
  12. 2021Review of Pedestrian Trajectory Prediction Methods: Comparing Deep Learning and Knowledge-based Approachescited by 30
2 more
  1. 2022Under the Hood of Transformer Networks for Trajectory Forecastingcited by 8
  2. 2022MixNet: Structured Deep Neural Motion Prediction for Autonomous Racingcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.