Surface Reading LLMs: Synthetic Text and its Styles
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Despite a potential plateau in ML advancement, the societal impact of large language models lies not in approaching superintelligence but in generating text surfaces indistinguishable from human writing. While Critical AI Studies provides essential material and socio-technical critique, it risks overlooking how LLMs phenomenologically reshape meaning-making. This paper proposes a semiotics of "surface integrity" as attending to the immediate plane where LLMs inscribe themselves into human communication. I distinguish three knowledge interests in ML research (epistemology, epist=em=e, and epistemics) and argue for integrating surface-level stylistic analysis alongside depth-oriented critique. Through two case studies examining stylistic markers of synthetic text, I argue how attending to style as a semiotic phenomenon reveals LLMs as cultural machines that transform the conditions of meaning emergence and circulation in contemporary discourse, independent of questions about machine consciousness.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 117 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Oct 2025.
Builds on
6 of 117 references.
References · 6
- 2020Closing the AI Accountability Gap: Defining an End-to-End Framework for Internal Algorithmic Auditingcited by 380
- 2024Delving into LLM-assisted writing in biomedical publications through excess vocabularycited by 75
- 2023The Vector Grounding Problemcited by 39
- 2025People who frequently use ChatGPT for writing tasks are accurate and robust detectors of AI-generated textcited by 39
- 2025Measuring AI "Slop" in Textcited by 6
- 2024The Method of Critical AI Studies, A Propaedeuticcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.