mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Method of Critical AI Studies, A Propaedeutic

arXiv 2411.18833 ↗First posted 28 Nov 2024cs.CYcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We outline some common methodological issues in the field of critical AI studies, including a tendency to overestimate the explanatory power of individual samples (the benchmark casuistry), a dependency on theoretical frameworks derived from earlier conceptualizations of computation (the black box casuistry), and a preoccupation with a cause-and-effect model of algorithmic harm (the stack casuistry). In the face of these issues, we call for, and point towards, a future set of methodologies that might take into account existing strengths in the humanistic close analysis of cultural objects.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 28 Nov 2024.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.