The Method of Critical AI Studies, A Propaedeutic
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We outline some common methodological issues in the field of critical AI studies, including a tendency to overestimate the explanatory power of individual samples (the benchmark casuistry), a dependency on theoretical frameworks derived from earlier conceptualizations of computation (the black box casuistry), and a preoccupation with a cause-and-effect model of algorithmic harm (the stack casuistry). In the face of these issues, we call for, and point towards, a future set of methodologies that might take into account existing strengths in the humanistic close analysis of cultural objects.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 28 Nov 2024.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.
2 papers.
- 2025The Evolving Nature of Latent Spaces: From GANs to Diffusioncited by 0
- 2025Surface Reading LLMs: Synthetic Text and its Stylescited by 0
- 2025Surface Reading LLMs: Synthetic Text and its Styles25 Oct 2025
- 2025The Evolving Nature of Latent Spaces: From GANs to Diffusion20 Oct 2025