Symbolic Regression and Differentiable Fits in Beyond the Standard Model Physics
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We demonstrate the efficacy of symbolic regression (SR) to probe models of particle physics Beyond the Standard Model (BSM), by considering the so-called Constrained Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (CMSSM). Like many incarnations of BSM physics this model has a number (four) of arbitrary parameters, which determine the experimental signals, and cosmological observables such as the dark matter relic density. We show that analysis of the phenomenology can be greatly accelerated by using symbolic expressions derived for the observables in terms of the input parameters. Here we focus on the Higgs mass, the cold dark matter relic density, and the contribution to the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon. We find that SR can produce remarkably accurate expressions. Using them we make global fits to derive the posterior probability densities of the CMSSM input parameters which are in good agreement with those performed using conventional methods. Moreover, we demonstrate a major advantage of SR which is the ability to make fits using differentiable methods rather than sampling methods. We also compare the method with neural network (NN) regression. SR produces more globally robust results, while NNs require data that is focussed on the promising regions in order to be equally performant.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Oct 2025.
Builds on
15 of 44 references.
References · 15
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,501
- 2019AI Feynman: a Physics-Inspired Method for Symbolic Regressioncited by 548
- 2018Pyro: Deep Universal Probabilistic Programmingcited by 380
- 2020Discovering Symbolic Models from Deep Learning with Inductive Biasescited by 344
- 2021Contemporary Symbolic Regression Methods and their Relative Performancecited by 215
- 2019Composable Effects for Flexible and Accelerated Probabilistic Programming in NumPyrocited by 191
- 2023Interpretable Machine Learning for Science with PySR and SymbolicRegression.jlcited by 54
- 2019Learning Symbolic Physics with Graph Networkscited by 53
- 2022Exhaustive Symbolic Regressioncited by 29
- 2023Symbolic Regression on FPGAs for Fast Machine Learning Inferencecited by 9
- 2023Interpretable Symbolic Regression for Data Science: Analysis of the 2022 Competitioncited by 6
3 more
- 2023Optimal Inflationary Potentialscited by 6
- 2024Symbolic Regression for Beyond the Standard Model Physicscited by 5
- 2022Exploration of Parameter Spaces Assisted by Machine Learningcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.