mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SmartSwitch: Advancing LLM Reasoning by Overcoming Underthinking via Promoting Deeper Thought Exploration

arXiv 2510.19767 ↗First posted 22 Oct 2025cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 2

On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking

Abstract (arXiv)

The long chain-of-thought (LongCoT) capability is central to the recent breakthroughs achieved by large language models in complex reasoning tasks. However, the accompanying issue of ''underthinking'', where models exhibit shallow reasoning by frequently switching thoughts without sufficient exploration, limits both performance and token efficiency. To address this problem, we propose a simple yet effective reasoning strategy: the SmartSwitch inference framework. This framework can be easily integrated into any large language model as a plug-and-play solution, continuously monitoring the model's reasoning process to detect underthinking and guide it toward deeper exploration of promising but overlooked thoughts. Specifically, the perception module identifies points where thoughts switch and evaluates the potential of the preceding thought using an off-the-shelf process reward model (PRM). If a high-potential thought is found to be prematurely abandoned, the intervention module interrupts the ongoing inference, backtracks to the point before the switch, and inserts a "deepening prompt" to encourage further exploration along that promising path. Extensive experiments on challenging mathematical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that our method significantly enhances the performance of various large language models of different sizes.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 14 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Oct 2025.

Builds on

14 of 26 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025s1: Simple test-time scaling31 Jan
  2. 2025Thoughts Are All Over the Place: On the Underthinking of o1-Like LLMs30 Jan
  3. 2024Do NOT Think That Much for 2+3=? On the Overthinking of o1-Like LLMs30 Dec
  4. 2024Imitate, Explore, and Self-Improve: A Reproduction Report on Slow-thinking Reasoning Systems12 Dec

Other references · 10

  1. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  2. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  3. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
  4. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
  5. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
  6. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
  7. 2024LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Codecited by 1,906
  8. 2025The Lessons of Developing Process Reward Models in Mathematical Reasoningcited by 402
  9. 2024ProcessBench: Identifying Process Errors in Mathematical Reasoningcited by 277
  10. 2025AURORA:Automated Training Framework of Universal Process Reward Models via Ensemble Prompting and Reverse Verificationcited by 22

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Not All Thoughts are Generated Equal: Efficient LLM Reasoning via Multi-Turn Reinforcement Learning
  2. 2025SwiReasoning: Switch-Thinking in Latent and Explicit for Pareto-Superior Reasoning LLMs
  3. 2025Deep Hidden Cognition Facilitates Reliable Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
  4. 2025Explore Briefly, Then Decide: Mitigating LLM Overthinking via Cumulative Entropy Regulation
  5. 2026ReEfBench: Quantifying the Reasoning Efficiency of LLMs
  6. 2025Stop Overthinking: A Survey on Efficient Reasoning for Large Language Models
  7. 2025Reasoning Beyond Language: A Comprehensive Survey on Latent Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
  8. 2025Large Reasoning Models are not thinking straight: on the unreliability of thinking trajectories