mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

SORA-ATMAS: Adaptive Trust Management and Multi-LLM Aligned Governance for Future Smart Cities

arXiv 2510.19327 ↗First posted 22 Oct 2025cs.MA cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The rapid evolution of smart cities has increased the reliance on intelligent interconnected services to optimize infrastructure, resources, and citizen well-being. Agentic AI has emerged as a key enabler by supporting autonomous decision-making and adaptive coordination, allowing urban systems to respond in real time to dynamic conditions. Its benefits are evident in areas such as transportation, where the integration of traffic data, weather forecasts, and safety sensors enables dynamic rerouting and a faster response to hazards. However, its deployment across heterogeneous smart city ecosystems raises critical governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) challenges, including accountability, data privacy, and regulatory alignment within decentralized infrastructures. Evaluation of SORA-ATMAS with three domain agents (Weather, Traffic, and Safety) demonstrated that its governance policies, including a fallback mechanism for high-risk scenarios, effectively steer multiple LLMs (GPT, Grok, DeepSeek) towards domain-optimized, policy-aligned outputs, producing an average MAE reduction of 35% across agents. Results showed stable weather monitoring, effective handling of high-risk traffic plateaus 0.85, and adaptive trust regulation in Safety/Fire scenarios 0.65. Runtime profiling of a 3-agent deployment confirmed scalability, with throughput between 13.8-17.2 requests per second, execution times below 72~ms, and governance delays under 100 ms, analytical projections suggest maintained performance at larger scales. Cross-domain rules ensured safe interoperability, with traffic rerouting permitted only under validated weather conditions. These findings validate SORA-ATMAS as a regulation-aligned, context-aware, and verifiable governance framework that consolidates distributed agent outputs into accountable, real-time decisions, offering a resilient foundation for smart-city management.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Oct 2025.

Builds on

3 of 58 references.

References · 3

  1. 2022Online Shielding for Reinforcement Learningcited by 22
  2. 2023A Review of Digital Twins and their Application in Cybersecurity based on Artificial Intelligencecited by 9
  3. 2024Edge-Cloud Continuum Orchestration of Critical Services: A Smart-City Approachcited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Swarm-Driven Multi-Agent Reasoning for Smart City Security
  2. 2025Large Language Model Powered Intelligent Urban Agents: Concepts, Capabilities, and Applications
  3. 2026Governance-Constrained Agentic AI: Blockchain-Enforced Human Oversight for Safety-Critical Wildfire Monitoring
  4. 2025Adaptive Cybersecurity Architecture for Digital Product Ecosystems Using Agentic AI
  5. 2025Enhancing Demand-Oriented Regionalization with Agentic AI and Local Heterogeneous Data for Adaptation Planning
  6. 2026Governing the Agentic Enterprise: A Governance Maturity Model for Managing AI Agent Sprawl in Business Operations
  7. 2025Trustless Autonomy: Understanding Motivations, Benefits, and Governance Dilemmas in Self-Sovereign Decentralized AI Agents
  8. 2025AgroAskAI: A Multi-Agentic AI Framework for Supporting Smallholder Farmers' Enquiries Globally