Select-Then-Decompose: From Empirical Analysis to Adaptive Selection Strategy for Task Decomposition in Large Language Models
On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable reasoning and planning capabilities, driving extensive research into task decomposition. Existing task decomposition methods focus primarily on memory, tool usage, and feedback mechanisms, achieving notable success in specific domains, but they often overlook the trade-off between performance and cost. In this study, we first conduct a comprehensive investigation on task decomposition, identifying six categorization schemes. Then, we perform an empirical analysis of three factors that influence the performance and cost of task decomposition: categories of approaches, characteristics of tasks, and configuration of decomposition and execution models, uncovering three critical insights and summarizing a set of practical principles. Building on this analysis, we propose the Select-Then-Decompose strategy, which establishes a closed-loop problem-solving process composed of three stages: selection, execution, and verification. This strategy dynamically selects the most suitable decomposition approach based on task characteristics and enhances the reliability of the results through a verification module. Comprehensive evaluations across multiple benchmarks show that the Select-Then-Decompose consistently lies on the Pareto frontier, demonstrating an optimal balance between performance and cost. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/summervvind/Select-Then-Decompose.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 25 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Oct 2025.
Builds on
25 of 42 references.
References · 25
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
- 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,754
- 2022Program of Thoughts Prompting: Disentangling Computation from Reasoning for Numerical Reasoning Taskscited by 1,076
- 2023ChatDev: Communicative Agents for Software Developmentcited by 919
13 more
- 2019DROP: A Reading Comprehension Benchmark Requiring Discrete Reasoning Over Paragraphscited by 903
- 2023Visual ChatGPT: Talking, Drawing and Editing with Visual Foundation Modelscited by 668
- 2022Decomposed Prompting: A Modular Approach for Solving Complex Taskscited by 558
- 2024Understanding the planning of LLM agents: A surveycited by 421
- 2023Harnessing the Power of LLMs in Practice: A Survey on ChatGPT and Beyondcited by 411
- 2022Reasoning with Language Model Prompting: A Surveycited by 252
- 2023Unleashing the Emergent Cognitive Synergy in Large Language Models: A Task-Solving Agent through Multi-Persona Self-Collaborationcited by 251
- 2023AutoAgents: A Framework for Automatic Agent Generationcited by 216
- 2023ADaPT: As-Needed Decomposition and Planning with Language Modelscited by 177
- 2024AutoKaggle: A Multi-Agent Framework for Autonomous Data Science Competitionscited by 70
- 2023PEARL: Prompting Large Language Models to Plan and Execute Actions Over Long Documentscited by 61
- 2024TDAG: A Multi-Agent Framework based on Dynamic Task Decomposition and Agent Generationcited by 51
- 2024Planning with Multi-Constraints via Collaborative Language Agentscited by 26
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.
5 papers.
- 2026Beyond tokens: a unified framework for latent communication in LLM-based multi-agent systemscited by 7
- 2026How to Steer Your Multi-Agent System: Human-LLM Collaborative Planningcited by 2
- 2026Toward Human-AI Complementarity Across Diverse Taskscited by 0
- 2026SPIEval: Evaluating Large Language Models as Mobile Assistants over Scattered Personal Informationcited by 0
- 2026Pay for the Fault, Not the Flow: Label-Free In-Flow Multi-Agent Workflow Optimizationcited by 0
- 2026Pay for the Fault, Not the Flow: Label-Free In-Flow Multi-Agent Workflow Optimization1 Oct 2026
- 2026SPIEval: Evaluating Large Language Models as Mobile Assistants over Scattered Personal Information11 Aug 2026
- 2026Beyond tokens: a unified framework for latent communication in LLM-based multi-agent systems4 Jun 2026
- 2026How to Steer Your Multi-Agent System: Human-LLM Collaborative Planning21 May 2026
- 2026Toward Human-AI Complementarity Across Diverse Tasks13 Apr 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023Adaptive-Solver Framework for Dynamic Strategy Selection in Large Language Model Reasoning
- 2025Decoupling Task-Solving and Output Formatting in LLM Generation
- 2024A Thorough Examination of Decoding Methods in the Era of LLMs
- 2023Small Language Models Fine-tuned to Coordinate Larger Language Models improve Complex Reasoning
- 2025Harnessing the Reasoning Economy: A Survey of Efficient Reasoning for Large Language Models
- 2026PPL-Factory: Task-Aware and Budget-Aware Data Selection from Language Modeling to Reasoning
- 2025From Efficiency to Adaptivity: A Deeper Look at Adaptive Reasoning in Large Language Models
- 2024Learning How Hard to Think: Input-Adaptive Allocation of LM Computation