mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Prediction-Augmented Trees for Reliable Statistical Inference

arXiv 2510.16937 ↗First posted 19 Oct 2025stat.ML cs.LG stat.MEcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The remarkable success of machine learning (ML) in predictive tasks has led scientists to incorporate ML predictions as a core component of the scientific discovery pipeline. This was exemplified by the landmark achievement of AlphaFold (Jumper et al. (2021)). In this paper, we study how ML predictions can be safely used in statistical analysis of data towards scientific discovery. In particular, we follow the framework introduced by Angelopoulos et al. (2023). In this framework, we assume access to a small set of n gold-standard labeled samples, a much larger set of N unlabeled samples, and a ML model that can be used to impute the labels of the unlabeled data points. We introduce two new learning-augmented estimators: (1) Prediction-Augmented Residual Tree (PART), and (2) Prediction-Augmented Quadrature (PAQ). Both estimators have significant advantages over existing estimators like PPI and PPI++ introduced by Angelopoulos et al. (2023) and Angelopoulos et al. (2024), respectively. PART is a decision-tree based estimator built using a greedy criterion. We first characterize PART's asymptotic distribution and demonstrate how to construct valid confidence intervals. Then we show that PART outperforms existing methods in real-world datasets from ecology, astronomy, and census reports, among other domains. This leads to estimators with higher confidence, which is the result of using both the gold-standard samples and the machine learning predictions. Finally, we provide a formal proof of the advantage of PART by exploring PAQ, an estimation that arises when considering the limit of PART when the depth its tree grows to infinity. Under appropriate assumptions in the input data we show that the variance of PAQ shrinks at rate of O(N-1 + n-4), improving significantly on the O(N-1+n-1) rate of existing methods.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Oct 2025.

Builds on

17 of 62 references.

References · 17

  1. 2021Retiring Adult: New Datasets for Fair Machine Learningcited by 443
  2. 2015Deep Knowledge Tracingcited by 328
  3. 2023Prediction-Powered Inferencecited by 214
  4. 2018Competitive caching with machine learned advicecited by 194
  5. 2020Algorithms with Predictionscited by 152
  6. 2023PPI++: Efficient Prediction-Powered Inferencecited by 103
  7. 2015Rotation-invariant convolutional neural networks for galaxy morphology predictioncited by 83
  8. 2023Cross-Prediction-Powered Inferencecited by 57
  9. 2022Learning-Augmented Mechanism Design: Leveraging Predictions for Facility Locationcited by 19
  10. 2022Algorithms with Prediction Portfolioscited by 19
  11. 2023Doubly Robust Self-Trainingcited by 18
  12. 2022Accurate RNA 3D structure prediction using a language model-based deep learning approachcited by 16
5 more
  1. 2024A Note on the Prediction-Powered Bootstrapcited by 10
  2. 2022Evolutionary bagging for ensemble learningcited by 6
  3. 2024Randomized Strategic Facility Location with Predictionscited by 4
  4. 2023Learning-Augmented Metric Distortion via (p,q)-Veto Corecited by 2
  5. 2024Clock Auctions Augmented with Unreliable Advicecited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.