The Right to Be Remembered: Preserving Maximally Truthful Digital Memory in the Age of AI
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Since the rapid expansion of large language models (LLMs), people have begun to rely on them for information retrieval. While traditional search engines display ranked lists of sources shaped by search engine optimization (SEO), advertising, and personalization, LLMs typically provide a synthesized response that feels singular and authoritative. While both approaches carry risks of bias and omission, LLMs may amplify the effect by collapsing multiple perspectives into one answer, reducing users ability or inclination to compare alternatives. This concentrates power over information in a few LLM vendors whose systems effectively shape what is remembered and what is overlooked. As a result, certain narratives, individuals or groups, may be disproportionately suppressed, while others are disproportionately elevated. Over time, this creates a new threat: the gradual erasure of those with limited digital presence, and the amplification of those already prominent, reshaping collective memory. To address these concerns, this paper presents a concept of the Right To Be Remembered (RTBR) which encompasses minimizing the risk of AI-driven information omission, embracing the right of fair treatment, while ensuring that the generated content would be maximally truthful.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Oct 2025.
Builds on
17 of 27 references.
References · 17
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
- 2022Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Knowcited by 1,783
- 2023A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Modelscited by 1,227
- 2023Whose Opinions Do Language Models Reflect?cited by 759
- 2023A Comprehensive Overview of Large Language Modelscited by 639
- 2023Understanding the Effects of RLHF on LLM Generalisation and Diversitycited by 386
- 2023Assessing Cross-Cultural Alignment between ChatGPT and Human Societies: An Empirical Studycited by 203
- 2024Bias and Unfairness in Information Retrieval Systems: New Challenges in the LLM Eracited by 97
- 2024Bias in Large Language Models: Origin, Evaluation, and Mitigationcited by 77
- 2022Towards Intersectionality in Machine Learning: Including More Identities, Handling Underrepresentation, and Performing Evaluationcited by 59
- 2024Investigating Bias in LLM-Based Bias Detection: Disparities between LLMs and Human Perceptioncited by 55
5 more
- 2024Characterizing Truthfulness in Large Language Model Generations with Local Intrinsic Dimensioncited by 45
- 2025Probing the Geometry of Truth: Consistency and Generalization of Truth Directions in LLMs Across Logical Transformations and Question Answering Taskscited by 18
- 2015The Journal Coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a Comparative Analysiscited by 14
- 2023EKILA: Synthetic Media Provenance and Attribution for Generative Artcited by 11
- 2024Why Companies "Democratise" Artificial Intelligence: The Case of Open Source Software Donationscited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.