mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

KITE: A Benchmark for Evaluating Korean Instruction-Following Abilities in Large Language Models

arXiv 2510.15558 ↗First posted 17 Oct 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The instruction-following capabilities of large language models (LLMs) are pivotal for numerous applications, from conversational agents to complex reasoning systems. However, current evaluations predominantly focus on English models, neglecting the linguistic and cultural nuances of other languages. Specifically, Korean, with its distinct syntax, rich morphological features, honorific system, and dual numbering systems, lacks a dedicated benchmark for assessing open-ended instruction-following capabilities. To address this gap, we introduce the Korean Instruction-following Task Evaluation (KITE), a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate both general and Korean-specific instructions. Unlike existing Korean benchmarks that focus mainly on factual knowledge or multiple-choice testing, KITE directly targets diverse, open-ended instruction-following tasks. Our evaluation pipeline combines automated metrics with human assessments, revealing performance disparities across models and providing deeper insights into their strengths and weaknesses. By publicly releasing the KITE dataset and code, we aim to foster further research on culturally and linguistically inclusive LLM development and inspire similar endeavors for other underrepresented languages.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Oct 2025.

Builds on

19 of 28 references.

References · 19

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  3. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  4. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
  5. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
  6. 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,848
  7. 2022No Language Left Behind: Scaling Human-Centered Machine Translationcited by 1,312
  8. 2020CLUE: A Chinese Language Understanding Evaluation Benchmarkcited by 278
  9. 2023Evaluating Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 202
  10. 2023SOLAR 10.7B: Scaling Large Language Models with Simple yet Effective Depth Up-Scalingcited by 172
  11. 2024KMMLU: Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding in Koreancited by 91
  12. 2023KoBBQ: Korean Bias Benchmark for Question Answeringcited by 71
7 more
  1. 2024CLIcK: A Benchmark Dataset of Cultural and Linguistic Intelligence in Koreancited by 66
  2. 2023HAE-RAE Bench: Evaluation of Korean Knowledge in Language Modelscited by 47
  3. 2020An Empirical Study of Tokenization Strategies for Various Korean NLP Taskscited by 33
  4. 2024KorNAT: LLM Alignment Benchmark for Korean Social Values and Common Knowledgecited by 33
  5. 2024Open Ko-LLM Leaderboard: Evaluating Large Language Models in Korean with Ko-H5 Benchmarkcited by 23
  6. 2024Investigating Multilingual Instruction-Tuning: Do Polyglot Models Demand for Multilingual Instructions?cited by 10
  7. 2023A Challenging Benchmark for Low-Resource Learningcited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.