mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

MAFA: A Multi-Agent Framework for Enterprise-Scale Annotation with Configurable Task Adaptation

arXiv 2510.14184 ↗First posted 16 Oct 2025cs.LG cs.AI cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We present MAFA (Multi-Agent Framework for Annotation), a production-deployed system that transforms enterprise-scale annotation workflows through configurable multi-agent collaboration. Addressing the critical challenge of annotation backlogs in financial services, where millions of customer utterances require accurate categorization, MAFA combines specialized agents with structured reasoning and a judge-based consensus mechanism. Our framework uniquely supports dynamic task adaptation, allowing organizations to define custom annotation types (FAQs, intents, entities, or domain-specific categories) through configuration rather than code changes. Deployed at JP Morgan Chase, MAFA has eliminated a 1 million utterance backlog while achieving, on average, 86% agreement with human annotators, annually saving over 5,000 hours of manual annotation work. The system processes utterances with annotation confidence classifications, which are typically 85% high, 10% medium, and 5% low across all datasets we tested. This enables human annotators to focus exclusively on ambiguous and low-coverage cases. We demonstrate MAFA's effectiveness across multiple datasets and languages, showing consistent improvements over traditional and single-agent annotation baselines: 13.8% higher Top-1 accuracy, 15.1% improvement in Top-5 accuracy, and 16.9% better F1 in our internal intent classification dataset and similar gains on public benchmarks. This work bridges the gap between theoretical multi-agent systems and practical enterprise deployment, providing a blueprint for organizations facing similar annotation challenges.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Oct 2025.

Builds on

9 of 28 references.

References · 9

  1. 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,568
  2. 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,455
  3. 2023Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debatecited by 1,784
  4. 2023ChatGPT Outperforms Crowd-Workers for Text-Annotation Taskscited by 870
  5. 2024Mixture-of-Agents Enhances Large Language Model Capabilitiescited by 438
  6. 2017Snorkel: Rapid Training Data Creation with Weak Supervisioncited by 372
  7. 2021Want To Reduce Labeling Cost? GPT-3 Can Helpcited by 196
  8. 2023AnnoLLM: Making Large Language Models to Be Better Crowdsourced Annotatorscited by 172
  9. 2024Diversity of Thought Elicits Stronger Reasoning Capabilities in Multi-Agent Debate Frameworkscited by 12

Built on by

Not cited yet.