mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Position: Require Frontier AI Labs To Release Small "Analog" Models

arXiv 2510.14053 ↗First posted 15 Oct 2025cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent proposals for regulating frontier AI models have sparked concerns about the cost of safety regulation, and most such regulations have been shelved due to the safety-innovation tradeoff. This paper argues for an alternative regulatory approach that ensures AI safety while actively promoting innovation: mandating that large AI laboratories release small, openly accessible analog models (scaled-down versions) trained similarly to and distilled from their largest proprietary models. Analog models serve as public proxies, allowing broad participation in safety verification, interpretability research, and algorithmic transparency without forcing labs to disclose their full-scale models. Recent research demonstrates that safety and interpretability methods developed using these smaller models generalize effectively to frontier-scale systems. By enabling the wider research community to directly investigate and innovate upon accessible analogs, our policy substantially reduces the regulatory burden and accelerates safety advancements. This mandate promises minimal additional costs, leveraging reusable resources like data and infrastructure, while significantly contributing to the public good. Our hope is not only that this policy be adopted, but that it illustrates a broader principle supporting fundamental research in machine learning: deeper understanding of models relaxes the safety-innovation tradeoff and lets us have more of both.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Oct 2025.

Builds on

23 of 38 references.

References · 23

  1. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  2. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
  3. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  4. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
  5. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
  6. 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
  7. 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,691
  8. 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,512
  9. 2023Distilling Step-by-Step! Outperforming Larger Language Models with Less Training Data and Smaller Model Sizescited by 737
  10. 2023Are Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models a Mirage?cited by 523
  11. 2023Weak-to-Strong Generalization: Eliciting Strong Capabilities With Weak Supervisioncited by 467
  12. 2024The Platonic Representation Hypothesiscited by 382
11 more
  1. 2015Convergent Learning: Do different neural networks learn the same representations?cited by 220
  2. 2021Revisiting Model Stitching to Compare Neural Representationscited by 209
  3. 2019Knowledge Distillation from Internal Representationscited by 87
  4. 2025Universal Sparse Autoencoders: Interpretable Cross-Model Concept Alignmentcited by 62
  5. 2024JetMoE: Reaching Llama2 Performance with 0.1M Dollarscited by 57
  6. 2025Harnessing the Universal Geometry of Embeddingscited by 55
  7. 2024X-VILA: Cross-Modality Alignment for Large Language Modelcited by 46
  8. 2025Shared Global and Local Geometry of Language Model Embeddingscited by 36
  9. 2024PreAlign: Boosting Cross-Lingual Transfer by Early Establishment of Multilingual Alignmentcited by 20
  10. 2025Activation Space Interventions Can Be Transferred Between Large Language Modelscited by 19
  11. 2024A transfer learning framework for weak-to-strong generalizationcited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.