mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Interpreting the Latent Structure of Operator Precedence in Language Models

arXiv 2510.13908 ↗First posted 14 Oct 2025cs.CLcited by 2

On the map: LLM reasoning → Mathematical reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive reasoning capabilities but continue to struggle with arithmetic tasks. Prior works largely focus on outputs or prompting strategies, leaving the open question of the internal structure through which models do arithmetic computation. In this work, we investigate whether LLMs encode operator precedence in their internal representations via the open-source instruction-tuned LLaMA 3.2-3B model. We constructed a dataset of arithmetic expressions with three operands and two operators, varying the order and placement of parentheses. Using this dataset, we trace whether intermediate results appear in the residual stream of the instruction-tuned LLaMA 3.2-3B model. We apply interpretability techniques such as logit lens, linear classification probes, and UMAP geometric visualization. Our results show that intermediate computations are present in the residual stream, particularly after MLP blocks. We also find that the model linearly encodes precedence in each operator's embeddings post attention layer. We introduce partial embedding swap, a technique that modifies operator precedence by exchanging high-impact embedding dimensions between operators.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Mathematical reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 11 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2025.

Builds on

11 of 15 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Integrating Arithmetic Learning Improves Mathematical Reasoning in Smaller Models18 Feb
  2. 2025Large Language Models and Mathematical Reasoning Failures17 Feb
  3. 2024GSM-Symbolic: Understanding the Limitations of Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models7 Oct
  4. 2023A Mechanistic Interpretation of Arithmetic Reasoning in Language Models using Causal Mediation Analysis24 May

Other references · 7

  1. 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,898
  2. 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,592
  3. 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,512
  4. 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,353
  5. 2024Interpreting and Improving Large Language Models in Arithmetic Calculationcited by 45
  6. 2024Towards Uncovering How Large Language Model Works: An Explainability Perspectivecited by 22
  7. 2024Adaptive Circuit Behavior and Generalization in Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Disentangling Mathematical Reasoning in LLMs: A Methodological Investigation of Internal Mechanisms
  2. 2024Unraveling Arithmetic in Large Language Models: The Role of Algebraic Structures
  3. 2026Beneath the Surface of Chains-of-Thought: A Mechanistic Interpretation of Reasoning Operations in LLMs
  4. 2026From Early Encoding to Late Suppression: Interpreting LLMs on Character Counting Tasks
  5. 2025Do Large Language Models Truly Grasp Addition? A Rule-Focused Diagnostic Using Two-Integer Arithmetic
  6. 2026A Single Layer to Explain Them All:Understanding Massive Activations in Large Language Models
  7. 2023Successor Heads: Recurring, Interpretable Attention Heads In The Wild
  8. 2026Unveiling the Reasoning Process of Large Language Models