Evaluating the Explainability of Vision Transformers in Medical Imaging
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Understanding model decisions is crucial in medical imaging, where interpretability directly impacts clinical trust and adoption. Vision Transformers (ViTs) have demonstrated state-of-the-art performance in diagnostic imaging; however, their complex attention mechanisms pose challenges to explainability. This study evaluates the explainability of different Vision Transformer architectures and pre-training strategies - ViT, DeiT, DINO, and Swin Transformer - using Gradient Attention Rollout and Grad-CAM. We conduct both quantitative and qualitative analyses on two medical imaging tasks: peripheral blood cell classification and breast ultrasound image classification. Our findings indicate that DINO combined with Grad-CAM offers the most faithful and localized explanations across datasets. Grad-CAM consistently produces class-discriminative and spatially precise heatmaps, while Gradient Attention Rollout yields more scattered activations. Even in misclassification cases, DINO with Grad-CAM highlights clinically relevant morphological features that appear to have misled the model. By improving model transparency, this research supports the reliable and explainable integration of ViTs into critical medical diagnostic workflows.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2025.
Builds on
12 of 20 references.
References · 12
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
- 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,560
- 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 825
- 2020Quantifying Attention Flow in Transformerscited by 759
- 2020Transformer Interpretability Beyond Attention Visualizationcited by 620
- 2023Towards Evaluating Explanations of Vision Transformers for Medical Imagingcited by 22
- 2023Explainability of Vision Transformers: A Comprehensive Review and New Perspectivescited by 12
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2026Toward Aristotelian Medical Representations: Backpropagation-Free Layer-wise Analysis for Interpretable Generalized Metric Learning on MedMNISTcited by 2
- 2025CLARiTy: A Vision Transformer for Multi-Label Classification and Weakly-Supervised Localization of Chest X-ray Pathologiescited by 1
- 2025UbiQVision: Quantifying Uncertainty in XAI for Image Recognitioncited by 0
- 2026Faithful Faithfulness Evaluations: Challenges & Pitfalls Learned from a Breast MRI Case Studycited by 0
- 2026Faithful Faithfulness Evaluations: Challenges & Pitfalls Learned from a Breast MRI Case Study22 Sep 2026
- 2026Toward Aristotelian Medical Representations: Backpropagation-Free Layer-wise Analysis for Interpretable Generalized Metric Learning on MedMNIST7 Apr 2026
- 2025UbiQVision: Quantifying Uncertainty in XAI for Image Recognition23 Dec 2025
- 2025CLARiTy: A Vision Transformer for Multi-Label Classification and Weakly-Supervised Localization of Chest X-ray Pathologies18 Dec 2025