mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Lingxi: Repository-Level Issue Resolution Framework Enhanced by Procedural Knowledge Guided Scaling

arXiv 2510.11838 ↗First posted 13 Oct 2025cs.SEcited by 12

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Driven by the advancements of Large Language Models (LLMs), LLM-powered agents are making significant improvements in software engineering tasks, yet struggle with complex, repository-level issue resolution. Existing agent-based methods have two key limitations. First, they lack of procedural knowledge (i.e., how an issue is fixed step-by-step and rationales behind it) to learn and leverage for issue resolution. Second, they rely on massive computational power to blindly explore the solution space. % To address those limitations, we propose Lingxi, an issue resolution framework that leverages procedural knowledge extracted from historical issue-fixing data to guide agents in solving repository-level issues. ourTool first constructs this knowledge offline through a hierarchical abstraction mechanism, enabling agents to learn the how and why behind a fix, not just the final solution. During online application, it employs a knowledge-driven scaling method that leverages the procedural knowledge of similar issues to intelligently analyze the target issue from multiple perspectives, in sharp contrast to undirected, brute-force exploration. % Lingxi successfully resolves 74.6% of bugs on the SWE-bench Verified benchmark in Past@1 setting, outperforming five state-of-the-art techniques by a significant margin (5.4% to 14.9%). Our comprehensive ablation study confirmed that the success of Lingxi comes directly from its use of procedural knowledge. Without it, the performance gains from scaling alone is negligible. Our qualitative study further shows that the ``design patterns & coding practices'' is the most critical knowledge aspect, and that the roles of different knowledge aspects switch across different stages (i.e., analysis, planning, and fixing).

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2025.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 10.

12 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026SkillForge: Self-Distilling Agents for Project-Specific Issue Resolution
  2. 2026Advances and Frontiers of LLM-based Issue Resolution in Software Engineering: A Comprehensive Survey
  3. 2026SWE-Adept: An LLM-Based Agentic Framework for Deep Codebase Analysis and Structured Issue Resolution
  4. 2024Alibaba LingmaAgent: Improving Automated Issue Resolution via Comprehensive Repository Exploration
  5. 2026Know Before Fix: QA-Driven Repository Knowledge Acquisition for Software Issue Resolution
  6. 2025SWE-Exp: Experience-Driven Software Issue Resolution
  7. 2026Beyond Textual Repository Exploration: Dual-Modal Structural Reasoning for Agentic Issue Resolution
  8. 2025SWE-Debate: Competitive Multi-Agent Debate for Software Issue Resolution