Countermind: A Multi-Layered Security Architecture for Large Language Models
On the map: LLM safety and security → Jailbreaking
Abstract (arXiv)
The security of Large Language Model (LLM) applications is fundamentally challenged by "form-first" attacks like prompt injection and jailbreaking, where malicious instructions are embedded within user inputs. Conventional defenses, which rely on post hoc output filtering, are often brittle and fail to address the root cause: the model's inability to distinguish trusted instructions from untrusted data. This paper proposes Countermind, a multi-layered security architecture intended to shift defenses from a reactive, post hoc posture to a proactive, pre-inference, and intra-inference enforcement model. The architecture proposes a fortified perimeter designed to structurally validate and transform all inputs, and an internal governance mechanism intended to constrain the model's semantic processing pathways before an output is generated. The primary contributions of this work are conceptual designs for: (1) A Semantic Boundary Logic (SBL) with a mandatory, time-coupled Text Crypter intended to reduce the plaintext prompt injection attack surface, provided all ingestion paths are enforced. (2) A Parameter-Space Restriction (PSR) mechanism, leveraging principles from representation engineering, to dynamically control the LLM's access to internal semantic clusters, with the goal of mitigating semantic drift and dangerous emergent behaviors. (3) A Secure, Self-Regulating Core that uses an OODA loop and a learning security module to adapt its defenses based on an immutable audit log. (4) A Multimodal Input Sandbox and Context-Defense mechanisms to address threats from non-textual data and long-term semantic poisoning. This paper outlines an evaluation plan designed to quantify the proposed architecture's effectiveness in reducing the Attack Success Rate (ASR) for form-first attacks and to measure its potential latency overhead.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Jailbreaking, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 16 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2025.
Builds on
16 of 29 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Evolving Security in LLMs: A Study of Jailbreak Attacks and Defenses2 Apr
- 2024Jailbreak Attacks and Defenses Against Large Language Models: A Survey5 Jul
Other references · 14
- 2024Know Your Limits: A Survey of Abstention in Large Language Modelscited by 121
- 2024Automatic and Universal Prompt Injection Attacks against Large Language Modelscited by 119
- 2019Ablation Studies in Artificial Neural Networkscited by 60
- 2025Which of These Best Describes Multiple Choice Evaluation with LLMs? A) Forced B) Flawed C) Fixable D) All of the Abovecited by 52
- 2024An Early Categorization of Prompt Injection Attacks on Large Language Modelscited by 30
- 2025Security Concerns for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 29
- 2023A Survey on Contextualised Semantic Shift Detectioncited by 22
- 2025Shadow in the Cache: Unveiling and Mitigating Privacy Risks of KV-cache in LLM Inferencecited by 21
- 2025A Survey of Attacks on Large Language Modelscited by 15
- 2025Learning Safety Constraints for Large Language Modelscited by 13
- 2025From Assistants to Adversaries: Exploring the Security Risks of Mobile LLM Agentscited by 10
- 2025Guardians and Offenders: A Survey on Harmful Content Generation and Safety Mitigation of LLMcited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023Self-Deception: Reverse Penetrating the Semantic Firewall of Large Language Models
- 2025Benchmarking Large Language Models for Cryptanalysis and Side-Channel Vulnerabilities
- 2024System-Level Defense against Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks: An Information Flow Control Perspective
- 2024Defending Large Language Models against Jailbreak Attacks via Semantic Smoothing
- 2025When Grammar Guides the Attack: Uncovering Control-Plane Vulnerabilities in LLMs with Structured Output
- 2026Know Thy Enemy: Securing LLMs Against Prompt Injection via Diverse Data Synthesis and Instruction-Level Chain-of-Thought Learning
- 2025Prompt Fencing: A Cryptographic Approach to Establishing Security Boundaries in Large Language Model Prompts
- 2024Jailbreaking Large Language Models Through Alignment Vulnerabilities in Out-of-Distribution Settings