How Reinforcement Learning After Next-Token Prediction Facilitates Learning
On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → RL training of language and agent models
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent advances in reasoning domains with neural networks have primarily been enabled by a training recipe that optimizes Large Language Models, previously trained to predict the next-token in a sequence, with reinforcement learning algorithms. We introduce a framework to study the success of this paradigm, and we theoretically expose the optimization mechanisms by which reinforcement learning improves over next-token prediction in this setting. We study learning from mixture distributions of short and long ``chain-of-thought'' sequences encoding a single task. In particular, when the task consists of predicting the parity of d bits and long sequences are rare, we show how reinforcement learning after next-token prediction enables autoregressive transformers to generalize, whereas mere next-token prediction requires extreme statistical or computational resources to do so. We further explain how reinforcement learning leverages increased test-time computation, manifested in longer responses, to facilitate this learning process. In a simplified setting, we theoretically prove that autoregressive linear models following this training recipe can efficiently learn to predict the parity of d bits as long as the proportion of long demonstrations in the data mix is not exponentially small in the input dimension d. Finally, we demonstrate these same phenomena in other settings, including the post-training of Llama-series models on mixture variations of common mathematical reasoning benchmarks.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RL training of language and agent models, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2025.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 10.
10 papers.
- 2026Teaching Models to Teach Themselves: Reasoning at the Edge of Learnabilitycited by 13
- 2026Learning Shrinks the Hard Tail: Training-Dependent Inference Scaling in a Solvable Linear Modelcited by 6
- 2026Sample Complexity of Autoregressive Reasoning: Chain-of-Thought vs. End-to-Endcited by 5
- 2026From Reasoning Traces to Reusable Modules: Understanding Compositional Generalization in Language Model Reasoningcited by 5
- 2026Post-Training with Policy Gradients: Optimality and the Base Model Barriercited by 3
- 2026Learning to Think from Multiple Thinkerscited by 3
- 2026A Theory of Online Learning with Autoregressive Chain-of-Thought Reasoningcited by 3
- 2026Select and Improve: Understanding the Mechanics of Post-Training for Reasoningcited by 2
- 2026RLVR landscapes for iterated multiplications can be benign: Insights from spin-glass theorycited by 0
- 2026What Pretraining and Midtraining Make Learnable from Rewards?cited by 0
- 2026What Pretraining and Midtraining Make Learnable from Rewards?29 Sep 2026
- 2026RLVR landscapes for iterated multiplications can be benign: Insights from spin-glass theory23 Sep 2026
- 2026From Reasoning Traces to Reusable Modules: Understanding Compositional Generalization in Language Model Reasoning16 Jun 2026
- 2026Select and Improve: Understanding the Mechanics of Post-Training for Reasoning11 Jun 2026
- 2026A Theory of Online Learning with Autoregressive Chain-of-Thought Reasoning7 May 2026
- 2026Learning to Think from Multiple Thinkers27 Apr 2026
- 2026Sample Complexity of Autoregressive Reasoning: Chain-of-Thought vs. End-to-End13 Apr 2026
- 2026Post-Training with Policy Gradients: Optimality and the Base Model Barrier7 Mar 2026
- 2026Teaching Models to Teach Themselves: Reasoning at the Edge of Learnability26 Jan 2026
- 2026Learning Shrinks the Hard Tail: Training-Dependent Inference Scaling in a Solvable Linear Model7 Jan 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Diversity or Precision? A Deep Dive into Next Token Prediction
- 2024The pitfalls of next-token prediction
- 2025Reinforcement Pre-Training
- 2026Unlocking the Critic: Reward-Free Policy Optimization for LLM Post-Training
- 2026Not all tokens are needed(NAT): token efficient reinforcement learning
- 2025TTRL: Test-Time Reinforcement Learning
- 2025Reinforcement Mid-Training
- 2025Low-probability Tokens Sustain Exploration in Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Reward