mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

How Reinforcement Learning After Next-Token Prediction Facilitates Learning

arXiv 2510.11495 ↗First posted 13 Oct 2025cs.LG stat.MLcited by 10

On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → RL training of language and agent models

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advances in reasoning domains with neural networks have primarily been enabled by a training recipe that optimizes Large Language Models, previously trained to predict the next-token in a sequence, with reinforcement learning algorithms. We introduce a framework to study the success of this paradigm, and we theoretically expose the optimization mechanisms by which reinforcement learning improves over next-token prediction in this setting. We study learning from mixture distributions of short and long ``chain-of-thought'' sequences encoding a single task. In particular, when the task consists of predicting the parity of d bits and long sequences are rare, we show how reinforcement learning after next-token prediction enables autoregressive transformers to generalize, whereas mere next-token prediction requires extreme statistical or computational resources to do so. We further explain how reinforcement learning leverages increased test-time computation, manifested in longer responses, to facilitate this learning process. In a simplified setting, we theoretically prove that autoregressive linear models following this training recipe can efficiently learn to predict the parity of d bits as long as the proportion of long demonstrations in the data mix is not exponentially small in the input dimension d. Finally, we demonstrate these same phenomena in other settings, including the post-training of Llama-series models on mixture variations of common mathematical reasoning benchmarks.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RL training of language and agent models, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2025.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 10.

10 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Diversity or Precision? A Deep Dive into Next Token Prediction
  2. 2024The pitfalls of next-token prediction
  3. 2025Reinforcement Pre-Training
  4. 2026Unlocking the Critic: Reward-Free Policy Optimization for LLM Post-Training
  5. 2026Not all tokens are needed(NAT): token efficient reinforcement learning
  6. 2025TTRL: Test-Time Reinforcement Learning
  7. 2025Reinforcement Mid-Training
  8. 2025Low-probability Tokens Sustain Exploration in Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Reward