Multi-View Graph Feature Propagation for Privacy Preservation and Feature Sparsity
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have demonstrated remarkable success in node classification tasks over relational data, yet their effectiveness often depends on the availability of complete node features. In many real-world scenarios, however, feature matrices are highly sparse or contain sensitive information, leading to degraded performance and increased privacy risks. Furthermore, direct exposure of information can result in unintended data leakage, enabling adversaries to infer sensitive information. To address these challenges, we propose a novel Multi-view Feature Propagation (MFP) framework that enhances node classification under feature sparsity while promoting privacy preservation. MFP extends traditional Feature Propagation (FP) by dividing the available features into multiple Gaussian-noised views, each propagating information independently through the graph topology. The aggregated representations yield expressive and robust node embeddings. This framework is novel in two respects: it introduces a mechanism that improves robustness under extreme sparsity, and it provides a principled way to balance utility with privacy. Extensive experiments conducted on graph datasets demonstrate that MFP outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in node classification while substantially reducing privacy leakage. Moreover, our analysis demonstrates that propagated outputs serve as alternative imputations rather than reconstructions of the original features, preserving utility without compromising privacy. A comprehensive sensitivity analysis further confirms the stability and practical applicability of MFP across diverse scenarios. Overall, MFP provides an effective and privacy-aware framework for graph learning in domains characterized by missing or sensitive features.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2025.
Builds on
17 of 37 references.
References · 17
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
- 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
- 2018Graph Neural Networks: A Review of Methods and Applicationscited by 1,571
- 2018Relational inductive biases, deep learning, and graph networkscited by 1,341
- 2016Revisiting Semi-Supervised Learning with Graph Embeddingscited by 970
- 2019MixHop: Higher-Order Graph Convolutional Architectures via Sparsified Neighborhood Mixingcited by 442
- 2013A Survey on Multi-view Learningcited by 152
- 2016A Survey of Multi-View Representation Learningcited by 107
- 2022Learning to Reconstruct Missing Data from Spatiotemporal Graphs with Sparse Observationscited by 64
- 2021On the Unreasonable Effectiveness of Feature propagation in Learning on Graphs with Missing Node Featurescited by 62
- 2024A Survey of Graph Neural Networks in Real world: Imbalance, Noise, Privacy and OOD Challengescited by 54
- 2020Graph Convolutional Networks for Graphs Containing Missing Featurescited by 46
5 more
- 2023Graph Positional Encoding via Random Feature Propagationcited by 30
- 2023A Survey on Privacy in Graph Neural Networks: Attacks, Preservation, and Applicationscited by 22
- 2020Incomplete Graph Representation and Learning via Partial Graph Neural Networkscited by 16
- 2022Towards a Data Privacy-Predictive Performance Trade-offcited by 5
- 2025Purifying Approximate Differential Privacy with Randomized Post-processingcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.