Emergence of hybrid computational dynamics through reinforcement learning
On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → Deep RL algorithms and representations
Abstract (arXiv)
Understanding how learning algorithms shape the computational strategies that emerge in neural networks remains a fundamental challenge in machine intelligence. While network architectures receive extensive attention, the role of the learning paradigm itself in determining emergent dynamics remains largely unexplored. Here we demonstrate that reinforcement learning (RL) and supervised learning (SL) drive recurrent neural networks (RNNs) toward fundamentally different computational solutions when trained on identical decision-making tasks. Through systematic dynamical systems analysis, we reveal that RL spontaneously discovers hybrid attractor architectures, combining stable fixed-point attractors for decision maintenance with quasi-periodic attractors for flexible evidence integration. This contrasts sharply with SL, which converges almost exclusively to simpler fixed-point-only solutions. We further show that RL sculpts functionally balanced neural populations through a powerful form of implicit regularization -- a structural signature that enhances robustness and is conspicuously absent in the more heterogeneous solutions found by SL-trained networks. The prevalence of these complex dynamics in RL is controllably modulated by weight initialization and correlates strongly with performance gains, particularly as task complexity increases. Our results establish the learning algorithm as a primary determinant of emergent computation, revealing how reward-based optimization autonomously discovers sophisticated dynamical mechanisms that are less accessible to direct gradient-based optimization. These findings provide both mechanistic insights into neural computation and actionable principles for designing adaptive AI systems.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Deep RL algorithms and representations, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 6 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2025.
Builds on
6 of 40 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 5
- 2022Grokking: Generalization Beyond Overfitting on Small Algorithmic Datasetscited by 629
- 2021Attractor and integrator networks in the braincited by 61
- 2020Deep Reinforcement Learning and its Neuroscientific Implicationscited by 33
- 2020Artificial neural networks for neuroscientists: A primercited by 26
- 2023Fast gradient-free activation maximization for neurons in spiking neural networkscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Unraveling the Hidden Dynamical Structure in Recurrent Neural Policies
- 2026Equilibrium Reasoners: Learning Attractors Enables Scalable Reasoning
- 2024Reservoir Computing for Fast, Simplified Reinforcement Learning on Memory Tasks
- 2021A brain basis of dynamical intelligence for AI and computational neuroscience
- 2026Continual Reinforcement Learning with Neuroevolution
- 2024Learning fast changing slow in spiking neural networks
- 2025Dynamical Alignment: A Principle for Adaptive Neural Computation
- 2024Dynamics of Supervised and Reinforcement Learning in the Non-Linear Perceptron