Test-Time Adaptation by Causal Trimming
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Test-time adaptation aims to improve model robustness under distribution shifts by adapting models with access to unlabeled target samples. A primary cause of performance degradation under such shifts is the model's reliance on features that lack a direct causal relationship with the prediction target. We introduce Test-time Adaptation by Causal Trimming (TACT), a method that identifies and removes non-causal components from representations for test distributions. TACT applies data augmentations that preserve causal features while varying non-causal ones. By analyzing the changes in the representations using Principal Component Analysis, TACT identifies the highest variance directions associated with non-causal features. It trims the representations by removing their projections on the identified directions, and uses the trimmed representations for the predictions. During adaptation, TACT continuously tracks and refines these directions to get a better estimate of non-causal features. We theoretically analyze the effectiveness of this approach and empirically validate TACT on real-world out-of-distribution benchmarks. TACT consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods by a significant margin.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2025.
Builds on
41 of 57 references.
References · 41
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
- 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,307
- 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,269
- 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,850
- 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,515
- 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,432
- 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,375
- 2020In Search of Lost Domain Generalizationcited by 1,054
- 2020Do We Really Need to Access the Source Data? Source Hypothesis Transfer for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 848
29 more
- 2023The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Modelscited by 716
- 2019Interpreting the Latent Space of GANs for Semantic Face Editingcited by 695
- 2022Continual Test-Time Domain Adaptationcited by 525
- 2022Efficient Test-Time Model Adaptation without Forgettingcited by 469
- 2020Improving robustness against common corruptions by covariate shift adaptationcited by 431
- 2023Towards Stable Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Wild Worldcited by 415
- 2019Nuanced Metrics for Measuring Unintended Bias with Real Data for Text Classificationcited by 404
- 2022Last Layer Re-Training is Sufficient for Robustness to Spurious Correlationscited by 381
- 2021MEMO: Test Time Robustness via Adaptation and Augmentationcited by 377
- 2022Contrastive Test-Time Adaptationcited by 261
- 2020Domain Generalization using Causal Matchingcited by 225
- 2022Parameter-free Online Test-time Adaptationcited by 189
- 2021A Fine-Grained Analysis on Distribution Shiftcited by 171
- 2022On Feature Learning in the Presence of Spurious Correlationscited by 145
- 2022Causality Inspired Representation Learning for Domain Generalizationcited by 138
- 2024Entropy is not Enough for Test-Time Adaptation: From the Perspective of Disentangled Factorscited by 106
- 2021OoD-Bench: Quantifying and Understanding Two Dimensions of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 86
- 2020Model Patching: Closing the Subgroup Performance Gap with Data Augmentationcited by 83
- 2016Deep Feature Interpolation for Image Content Changescited by 80
- 2024Test-Time Model Adaptation with Only Forward Passescited by 74
- 2022Test-Time Adaptation via Self-Training with Nearest Neighbor Informationcited by 64
- 2023On Pitfalls of Test-Time Adaptationcited by 64
- 2018Whole-Slide Mitosis Detection in H&E Breast Histology Using PHH3 as a Reference to Train Distilled Stain-Invariant Convolutional Networkscited by 57
- 2023AdaNPC: Exploring Non-Parametric Classifier for Test-Time Adaptationcited by 48
- 2022Harnessing Out-Of-Distribution Examples via Augmenting Content and Stylecited by 43
- 2023Feature Alignment and Uniformity for Test Time Adaptationcited by 42
- 2022Modeling the Data-Generating Process is Necessary for Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 34
- 2023Out-of-Domain Robustness via Targeted Augmentationscited by 24
- 2022CAFA: Class-Aware Feature Alignment for Test-Time Adaptationcited by 21
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.