mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Auditing Information Disclosure During Large-Scale Gradient-Based Training via Gradient Uniqueness

arXiv 2510.10902 ↗First posted 13 Oct 2025cs.LG stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Auditing information disclosure across every datapoint during the training of LLMs is challenging. We propose a principled, attack-agnostic approach that uses mutual information to measure what the final model reveals about a datapoint's training membership. We show that this final-model disclosure is upper bounded by the sum of per-iteration gradient disclosures and that, under a reasonable set of assumptions, these gradient disclosures increase with Gradient Uniqueness (GNQ), which measures how distinguishable a datapoint's gradient is relative to other gradients in the batch. While naively computing GNQ requires forming and inverting a P× P matrix for every datapoint (for a model with P parameters), we introduce Batch-Space Ghost (BS-Ghost). This efficient algorithm performs all computations in a much smaller batch space and uses ghost kernels to compute GNQ "in-run" for every datapoint in the training corpus, with minimal computational and memory overhead. Our experiments show the following: (i) GNQ predicts MIA vulnerability without the need for shadow models. (ii) Beyond membership disclosure, GNQ predicts the success of reconstruction attacks. (iii) GNQ-guided removal and retraining identify datapoints that causally contribute to disclosure. (iv) GNQ outperforms counterfactual memorization in text extraction and common-knowledge discrimination without the need for additional model training. (v) For data attribution, GNQ-guided filtering reduces emergent misalignment in Qwen2.5-7B more than baselines. Further, GNQ attributes 1000 datapoints in 17 seconds---roughly 70× faster than the baselines. (vi) GNQ explains how training choices affect training-set disclosure and captures how per-datapoint disclosure emerges during training.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2025.

Builds on

32 of 40 references.

References · 32

  1. 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 2,992
  2. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
  3. 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,144
  4. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
  5. 2018The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural Networkscited by 847
  6. 2021Membership Inference Attacks From First Principlescited by 839
  7. 2022Quantifying Memorization Across Neural Language Modelscited by 755
  8. 2020What Neural Networks Memorize and Why: Discovering the Long Tail via Influence Estimationcited by 492
  9. 2018ML-Leaks: Model and Data Independent Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses on Machine Learning Modelscited by 475
  10. 2019Does Learning Require Memorization? A Short Tale about a Long Tailcited by 452
  11. 2021Large Language Models Can Be Strong Differentially Private Learnerscited by 405
  12. 2023Studying Large Language Model Generalization with Influence Functionscited by 311
20 more
  1. 2025Persona Vectors: Monitoring and Controlling Character Traits in Language Modelscited by 303
  2. 2023Analyzing Leakage of Personally Identifiable Information in Language Modelscited by 278
  3. 2020Systematic Evaluation of Privacy Risks of Machine Learning Modelscited by 273
  4. 2023Membership Inference Attacks against Language Models via Neighbourhood Comparisoncited by 249
  5. 2021Counterfactual Memorization in Neural Language Modelscited by 155
  6. 2023ProPILE: Probing Privacy Leakage in Large Language Modelscited by 127
  7. 2023Privacy Auditing with One (1) Training Runcited by 119
  8. 2019Information-Theoretic Generalization Bounds for SGLD via Data-Dependent Estimatescited by 118
  9. 2023Foundation Models and Fair Usecited by 112
  10. 2022Preventing Verbatim Memorization in Language Models Gives a False Sense of Privacycited by 97
  11. 2020Sharpened Generalization Bounds based on Conditional Mutual Information and an Application to Noisy, Iterative Algorithmscited by 89
  12. 2024Data Shapley in One Training Runcited by 76
  13. 2023Bag of Tricks for Training Data Extraction from Language Modelscited by 67
  14. 2024ReCaLL: Membership Inference via Relative Conditional Log-Likelihoodscited by 61
  15. 2020Scaling up Differentially Private Deep Learning with Fast Per-Example Gradient Clippingcited by 46
  16. 2023Training Data Extraction From Pre-trained Language Models: A Surveycited by 43
  17. 2024Measuring memorization in language models via probabilistic extractioncited by 40
  18. 2022Canary Extraction in Natural Language Understanding Modelscited by 20
  19. 2024The Files are in the Computer: On Copyright, Memorization, and Generative AIcited by 20
  20. 2023Quantifying and Analyzing Entity-level Memorization in Large Language Modelscited by 18

Built on by

Not cited yet.