Auditing Information Disclosure During Large-Scale Gradient-Based Training via Gradient Uniqueness
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Auditing information disclosure across every datapoint during the training of LLMs is challenging. We propose a principled, attack-agnostic approach that uses mutual information to measure what the final model reveals about a datapoint's training membership. We show that this final-model disclosure is upper bounded by the sum of per-iteration gradient disclosures and that, under a reasonable set of assumptions, these gradient disclosures increase with Gradient Uniqueness (GNQ), which measures how distinguishable a datapoint's gradient is relative to other gradients in the batch. While naively computing GNQ requires forming and inverting a P× P matrix for every datapoint (for a model with P parameters), we introduce Batch-Space Ghost (BS-Ghost). This efficient algorithm performs all computations in a much smaller batch space and uses ghost kernels to compute GNQ "in-run" for every datapoint in the training corpus, with minimal computational and memory overhead. Our experiments show the following: (i) GNQ predicts MIA vulnerability without the need for shadow models. (ii) Beyond membership disclosure, GNQ predicts the success of reconstruction attacks. (iii) GNQ-guided removal and retraining identify datapoints that causally contribute to disclosure. (iv) GNQ outperforms counterfactual memorization in text extraction and common-knowledge discrimination without the need for additional model training. (v) For data attribution, GNQ-guided filtering reduces emergent misalignment in Qwen2.5-7B more than baselines. Further, GNQ attributes 1000 datapoints in 17 seconds---roughly 70× faster than the baselines. (vi) GNQ explains how training choices affect training-set disclosure and captures how per-datapoint disclosure emerges during training.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2025.
Builds on
32 of 40 references.
References · 32
- 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 2,992
- 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
- 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,144
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
- 2018The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural Networkscited by 847
- 2021Membership Inference Attacks From First Principlescited by 839
- 2022Quantifying Memorization Across Neural Language Modelscited by 755
- 2020What Neural Networks Memorize and Why: Discovering the Long Tail via Influence Estimationcited by 492
- 2018ML-Leaks: Model and Data Independent Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses on Machine Learning Modelscited by 475
- 2019Does Learning Require Memorization? A Short Tale about a Long Tailcited by 452
- 2021Large Language Models Can Be Strong Differentially Private Learnerscited by 405
- 2023Studying Large Language Model Generalization with Influence Functionscited by 311
20 more
- 2025Persona Vectors: Monitoring and Controlling Character Traits in Language Modelscited by 303
- 2023Analyzing Leakage of Personally Identifiable Information in Language Modelscited by 278
- 2020Systematic Evaluation of Privacy Risks of Machine Learning Modelscited by 273
- 2023Membership Inference Attacks against Language Models via Neighbourhood Comparisoncited by 249
- 2021Counterfactual Memorization in Neural Language Modelscited by 155
- 2023ProPILE: Probing Privacy Leakage in Large Language Modelscited by 127
- 2023Privacy Auditing with One (1) Training Runcited by 119
- 2019Information-Theoretic Generalization Bounds for SGLD via Data-Dependent Estimatescited by 118
- 2023Foundation Models and Fair Usecited by 112
- 2022Preventing Verbatim Memorization in Language Models Gives a False Sense of Privacycited by 97
- 2020Sharpened Generalization Bounds based on Conditional Mutual Information and an Application to Noisy, Iterative Algorithmscited by 89
- 2024Data Shapley in One Training Runcited by 76
- 2023Bag of Tricks for Training Data Extraction from Language Modelscited by 67
- 2024ReCaLL: Membership Inference via Relative Conditional Log-Likelihoodscited by 61
- 2020Scaling up Differentially Private Deep Learning with Fast Per-Example Gradient Clippingcited by 46
- 2023Training Data Extraction From Pre-trained Language Models: A Surveycited by 43
- 2024Measuring memorization in language models via probabilistic extractioncited by 40
- 2022Canary Extraction in Natural Language Understanding Modelscited by 20
- 2024The Files are in the Computer: On Copyright, Memorization, and Generative AIcited by 20
- 2023Quantifying and Analyzing Entity-level Memorization in Large Language Modelscited by 18
Built on by
Not cited yet.