SGM: A Statistical Godel Machine for Risk-Controlled Recursive Self-Modification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recursive self-modification is increasingly central in AutoML, neural architecture search, and adaptive optimization, yet no existing framework ensures that such changes are made safely. Godel machines offer a principled safeguard by requiring formal proofs of improvement before rewriting code; however, such proofs are unattainable in stochastic, high-dimensional settings. We introduce the Statistical Godel Machine (SGM), the first statistical safety layer for recursive edits. SGM replaces proof-based requirements with statistical confidence tests (e-values, Hoeffding bounds), admitting a modification only when superiority is certified at a chosen confidence level, while allocating a global error budget to bound cumulative risk across rounds.We also propose Confirm-Triggered Harmonic Spending (CTHS), which indexes spending by confirmation events rather than rounds, concentrating the error budget on promising edits while preserving familywise validity.Experiments across supervised learning, reinforcement learning, and black-box optimization validate this role: SGM certifies genuine gains on CIFAR-100, rejects spurious improvement on ImageNet-100, and demonstrates robustness on RL and optimization benchmarks.Together, these results position SGM as foundational infrastructure for continual, risk-aware self-modification in learning systems.Code is available at: https://github.com/gravitywavelet/sgm-anon.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Oct 2025.
Builds on
8 of 14 references.
References · 8
- 2016Hyperband: A Novel Bandit-Based Approach to Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 688
- 2018BOHB: Robust and Efficient Hyperparameter Optimization at Scalecited by 466
- 2017Population Based Training of Neural Networkscited by 351
- 2025Darwin Godel Machine: Open-Ended Evolution of Self-Improving Agentscited by 294
- 2018Time-uniform, nonparametric, nonasymptotic confidence sequencescited by 220
- 2020Estimating means of bounded random variables by bettingcited by 164
- 2019Approval policies for modifications to Machine Learning-Based Software as a Medical Device: A study of bio-creepcited by 4
- 2017Group Sequential Crossover Trial Designs with Strong Control of the Familywise Error Ratecited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 6.
7 papers.
- 2026Self-Evolving Agents with Anytime-Valid Certificatescited by 6
- 2026Recursive self-improvement of AI research agentscited by 3
- 2026SAHOO: Safeguarded Alignment for High-Order Optimization Objectives in Recursive Self-Improvementcited by 2
- 2025When Does Pairing Seeds Reduce Variance? Evidence from a Multi-Agent Economic Simulationcited by 0
- 2026Generalized Agent Iteration: One Formal Framework for Iterative Policy Improvement and Recursive Self-Improvementcited by 0
- 2026Which Self-Improvements Should We Trust? Reliable Self-Improvement When Agents Reuse Their Benchmarkscited by 0
- 2026G"odel Forest: Balancing Search Depth and Breadth for Data-Centric Recursive Self-Improvementcited by 0
- 2026G"odel Forest: Balancing Search Depth and Breadth for Data-Centric Recursive Self-Improvement29 Sep 2026
- 2026Which Self-Improvements Should We Trust? Reliable Self-Improvement When Agents Reuse Their Benchmarks27 Sep 2026
- 2026Recursive self-improvement of AI research agents22 Sep 2026
- 2026Generalized Agent Iteration: One Formal Framework for Iterative Policy Improvement and Recursive Self-Improvement11 Sep 2026
- 2026Self-Evolving Agents with Anytime-Valid Certificates1 Jul 2026
- 2026SAHOO: Safeguarded Alignment for High-Order Optimization Objectives in Recursive Self-Improvement6 Mar 2026
- 2025When Does Pairing Seeds Reduce Variance? Evidence from a Multi-Agent Economic Simulation30 Dec 2025