mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

PhysToolBench: Benchmarking Physical Tool Understanding for MLLMs

arXiv 2510.09507 ↗First posted 10 Oct 2025cs.CV cs.ROcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The ability to use, understand, and create tools is a hallmark of human intelligence, enabling sophisticated interaction with the physical world. For any general-purpose intelligent agent to achieve true versatility, it must also master these fundamental skills. While modern Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) leverage their extensive common knowledge for high-level planning in embodied AI and in downstream Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models, the extent of their true understanding of physical tools remains unquantified. To bridge this gap, we present PhysToolBench, the first benchmark dedicated to evaluating the comprehension of physical tools by MLLMs. Our benchmark is structured as a Visual Question Answering (VQA) dataset comprising over 1,000 image-text pairs. It assesses capabilities across three distinct difficulty levels: (1) Tool Recognition: Requiring the recognition of a tool's primary function. (2) Tool Understanding: Testing the ability to grasp the underlying principles of a tool's operation. (3) Tool Creation: Challenging the model to fashion a new tool from surrounding objects when conventional options are unavailable. Our comprehensive evaluation of 32 MLLMs-spanning proprietary, open-source, specialized embodied, and backbones in VLAs-reveals a significant deficiency in tool understanding. Furthermore, we provide an in-depth analysis and propose preliminary solutions. Code and dataset are publicly available.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2025.

Builds on

35 of 40 references.

References · 35

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  3. 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,418
  4. 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,467
  5. 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,310
  6. 2024Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolutioncited by 4,151
  7. 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,655
  8. 2024OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Modelcited by 2,777
  9. 2024π0: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Controlcited by 2,297
  10. 2023PaLM-E: An Embodied Multimodal Language Modelcited by 2,037
  11. 2024Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model Locally on Your Phonecited by 1,883
  12. 2025InternVL3: Exploring Advanced Training and Test-Time Recipes for Open-Source Multimodal Modelscited by 1,769
23 more
  1. 2025π0.5: a Vision-Language-Action Model with Open-World Generalizationcited by 1,653
  2. 2025InternVL3.5: Advancing Open-Source Multimodal Models in Versatility, Reasoning, and Efficiencycited by 1,419
  3. 2024PaliGemma: A versatile 3B VLM for transfercited by 679
  4. 2024DeepSeek-VL2: Mixture-of-Experts Vision-Language Models for Advanced Multimodal Understandingcited by 559
  5. 2025Kimi-VL Technical Reportcited by 381
  6. 2024Prismatic VLMs: Investigating the Design Space of Visually-Conditioned Language Modelscited by 336
  7. 2024TraceVLA: Visual Trace Prompting Enhances Spatial-Temporal Awareness for Generalist Robotic Policiescited by 298
  8. 2024ToolSandbox: A Stateful, Conversational, Interactive Evaluation Benchmark for LLM Tool Use Capabilitiescited by 272
  9. 2023MetaTool Benchmark for Large Language Models: Deciding Whether to Use Tools and Which to Usecited by 209
  10. 2025DexVLA: Vision-Language Model with Plug-In Diffusion Expert for General Robot Controlcited by 191
  11. 2024Ovis: Structural Embedding Alignment for Multimodal Large Language Modelcited by 167
  12. 2025Magma: A Foundation Model for Multimodal AI Agentscited by 138
  13. 2025Ovis2.5 Technical Reportcited by 103
  14. 2025RoboBrain 2.0 Technical Reportcited by 87
  15. 2024Planning, Creation, Usage: Benchmarking LLMs for Comprehensive Tool Utilization in Real-World Complex Scenarioscited by 85
  16. 2024DINO-X: A Unified Vision Model for Open-World Object Detection and Understandingcited by 85
  17. 2025ToolHop: A Query-Driven Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Multi-Hop Tool Usecited by 48
  18. 2025Embodied-R1: Reinforced Embodied Reasoning for General Robotic Manipulationcited by 36
  19. 2025Argus: Vision-Centric Reasoning with Grounded Chain-of-Thoughtcited by 26
  20. 2024MTU-Bench: A Multi-granularity Tool-Use Benchmark for Large Language Modelscited by 17
  21. 2025MimicFunc: Imitating Tool Manipulation from a Single Human Video via Functional Correspondencecited by 11
  22. 2025VLMgineer: Vision Language Models as Robotic Toolsmithscited by 9
  23. 2025Affordance Benchmark for MLLMscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 7.

9 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Beyond APIs: Probing the Limits of MLLMs in Physical Tool Use
  2. 2024ManipVQA: Injecting Robotic Affordance and Physically Grounded Information into Multi-Modal Large Language Models
  3. 2025PhysBench: Benchmarking and Enhancing Vision-Language Models for Physical World Understanding
  4. 2024MLLM-Tool: A Multimodal Large Language Model For Tool Agent Learning
  5. 2026VTC-Bench: Evaluating Agentic Multimodal Models via Compositional Visual Tool Chaining
  6. 2025EmbodiedBench: Comprehensive Benchmarking Multi-modal Large Language Models for Vision-Driven Embodied Agents
  7. 2023Physically Grounded Vision-Language Models for Robotic Manipulation
  8. 2025ManipBench: Benchmarking Vision-Language Models for Low-Level Robot Manipulation