mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Deep Learning to Identify the Spatio-Temporal Cascading Effects of Train Delays in a High-Density Network

arXiv 2510.09350 ↗First posted 10 Oct 2025cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The operational efficiency of railway networks, a cornerstone of modern economies, is persistently undermined by the cascading effects of train delays. Accurately forecasting this delay propagation is a critical challenge for real-time traffic management. While recent research has leveraged Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) to model the network structure of railways, a significant gap remains in developing frameworks that provide multi-step autoregressive forecasts at a network-wide scale, while simultaneously offering the live, interpretable explanations needed for decision support. This paper addresses this gap by developing and evaluating a novel XGeoAI framework for live, explainable, multi-step train delay forecasting. The core of this work is a two-stage, autoregressive Graph Attention Network (GAT) model, trained on a real-world dataset covering over 40% of the Dutch railway network. The model represents the system as a spatio-temporal graph of operational events (arrivals and departures) and is enriched with granular features, including platform and station congestion. To test its viability for live deployment, the model is rigorously evaluated using a sequential, k-step-ahead forecasting protocol that simulates real-world conditions where prediction errors can compound. The results demonstrate that while the proposed GATv2 model is challenged on pure error metrics (MAE) by a simpler Persistence baseline, it achieves consistently higher precision in classifying delay events -- a crucial advantage for a reliable decision support tool.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2025.

Builds on

9 of 41 references.

References · 9

  1. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
  2. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,669
  3. 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networkscited by 2,919
  4. 2016Geometric deep learning: going beyond Euclidean datacited by 1,048
  5. 2019GNNExplainer: Generating Explanations for Graph Neural Networkscited by 737
  6. 2021Graph Neural Network for Traffic Forecasting: A Surveycited by 261
  7. 2016Professor Forcing: A New Algorithm for Training Recurrent Networkscited by 216
  8. 2020Why Attentions May Not Be Interpretable?cited by 41
  9. 2023Bridging the Gap Between Multi-Step and One-Shot Trajectory Prediction via Self-Supervisioncited by 7

Built on by

Not cited yet.