mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Exploiting Web Search Tools of AI Agents for Data Exfiltration

arXiv 2510.09093 ↗First posted 10 Oct 2025cs.CR cs.CLcited by 3

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) are now routinely used to autonomously execute complex tasks, from natural language processing to dynamic workflows like web searches. The usage of tool-calling and Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) allows LLMs to process and retrieve sensitive corporate data, amplifying both their functionality and vulnerability to abuse. As LLMs increasingly interact with external data sources, indirect prompt injection emerges as a critical and evolving attack vector, enabling adversaries to exploit models through manipulated inputs. Through a systematic evaluation of indirect prompt injection attacks across diverse models, we analyze how susceptible current LLMs are to such attacks, which parameters, including model size and manufacturer, specific implementations, shape their vulnerability, and which attack methods remain most effective. Our results reveal that even well-known attack patterns continue to succeed, exposing persistent weaknesses in model defenses. To address these vulnerabilities, we emphasize the need for strengthened training procedures to enhance inherent resilience, a centralized database of known attack vectors to enable proactive defense, and a unified testing framework to ensure continuous security validation. These steps are essential to push developers toward integrating security into the core design of LLMs, as our findings show that current models still fail to mitigate long-standing threats.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 22 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2025.

Builds on

22 of 25 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025A Survey of Attacks on Large Language Models18 May
  2. 2024Security of AI Agents12 Jun

Other references · 20

  1. 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 2,914
  2. 2023Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injectioncited by 1,339
  3. 2023A Comprehensive Overview of Large Language Modelscited by 639
  4. 2023GPTFUZZER: Red Teaming Large Language Models with Auto-Generated Jailbreak Promptscited by 520
  5. 2023"Do Anything Now": Characterizing and Evaluating In-The-Wild Jailbreak Prompts on Large Language Modelscited by 457
  6. 2024The Instruction Hierarchy: Training LLMs to Prioritize Privileged Instructionscited by 441
  7. 2023GPT-4 Is Too Smart To Be Safe: Stealthy Chat with LLMs via Ciphercited by 401
  8. 2023Formalizing and Benchmarking Prompt Injection Attacks and Defensescited by 328
  9. 2025Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Survey on Agentic RAGcited by 242
  10. 2024Optimization-based Prompt Injection Attack to LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 123
  11. 2023AutoDAN: Interpretable Gradient-Based Adversarial Attacks on Large Language Modelscited by 102
  12. 2024LLM With Tools: A Surveycited by 60
8 more
  1. 2022"Real Attackers Don't Compute Gradients": Bridging the Gap Between Adversarial ML Research and Practicecited by 55
  2. 2025Can Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks Be Detected and Removed?cited by 43
  3. 2025Lessons from Defending Gemini Against Indirect Prompt Injectionscited by 40
  4. 2024PyRIT: A Framework for Security Risk Identification and Red Teaming in Generative AI Systemcited by 29
  5. 2024Dataset and Lessons Learned from the 2024 SaTML LLM Capture-the-Flag Competitioncited by 20
  6. 2025LLMail-Inject: A Dataset from a Realistic Adaptive Prompt Injection Challengecited by 20
  7. 2024Vocabulary Attack to Hijack Large Language Model Applicationscited by 12
  8. 2024Plentiful Jailbreaks with String Compositionscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Overcoming the Retrieval Barrier: Indirect Prompt Injection in the Wild for LLM Systems
  2. 2026A Layered Security Framework Against Prompt Injection in RAG-Based Chatbots
  3. 2025Securing AI Agents Against Prompt Injection Attacks
  4. 2024Towards Action Hijacking of Large Language Model-based Agent
  5. 2026From Prompt Injection to Web Exploitation: Revisiting Classic Vulnerabilities in LLM-Integrated Applications
  6. 2024Data Extraction Attacks in Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Backdoors
  7. 2026Universal Defenses for Tool-Integrated LLM Agents Against Adversarial Attacks
  8. 2026ClawGuard: A Runtime Security Framework for Tool-Augmented LLM Agents Against Indirect Prompt Injection