mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Environmental Impacts of Language Model Training Keep Rising Now is the Time to Catch Impacts on the Rebound

arXiv 2510.09022 ↗First posted 10 Oct 2025cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent Machine Learning (ML) approaches have shown increased performance on benchmarks at the cost of escalating compute demands. Hardware, algorithmic and carbon optimizations have been proposed to curb energy use and environmental impacts. We estimate the environmental impacts associated with training models documented in the Epoch AI database over the last decade, with a particular focus on impacts associated with Large Language Models and the hardware used to train them. We find that energy use and environmental impacts associated with training ML models have increased exponentially, even when considering impact reduction strategies such as using less carbon intensive electricity mixes or more efficient hardware. Optimization strategies do not mitigate the impacts induced by model training, suggesting rebound effect. We show that the impacts of hardware must be considered over the entire life cycle rather than the sole use phase in order to avoid impact shifting. Our study demonstrates that increasing efficiency alone does not ensure sustainability. There is an urgent need to systematically integrate environmental impacts in NLP evaluation practices to better inform the community and support the use of impact as a feature in research planning and decision making.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2025.

Builds on

20 of 60 references.

References · 20

  1. 2019Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLPcited by 1,242
  2. 2019Green AIcited by 620
  3. 2024OLMo: Accelerating the Science of Language Modelscited by 599
  4. 2022Estimating the Carbon Footprint of BLOOM, a 176B Parameter Language Modelcited by 264
  5. 2020Towards the Systematic Reporting of the Energy and Carbon Footprints of Machine Learningcited by 246
  6. 2021Sustainable AI: Environmental Implications, Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 242
  7. 2020The Computational Limits of Deep Learningcited by 188
  8. 2022The Carbon Footprint of Machine Learning Training Will Plateau, Then Shrinkcited by 183
  9. 2020Carbontracker: Tracking and Predicting the Carbon Footprint of Training Deep Learning Modelscited by 168
  10. 2022Compute Trends Across Three Eras of Machine Learningcited by 161
  11. 2022Fine-tuned Language Models are Continual Learnerscited by 152
  12. 2023A Systematic Review of Green AIcited by 77
8 more
  1. 2020Chasing Carbon: The Elusive Environmental Footprint of Computingcited by 71
  2. 2024Hype, Sustainability, and the Price of the Bigger-is-Better Paradigm in AIcited by 35
  3. 2023How to estimate carbon footprint when training deep learning models? A guide and reviewcited by 34
  4. 2025Holistically Evaluating the Environmental Impact of Creating Language Modelscited by 26
  5. 2025From Efficiency Gains to Rebound Effects: The Problem of Jevons' Paradox in AI's Polarized Environmental Debatecited by 23
  6. 2022Towards Climate Awareness in NLP Researchcited by 19
  7. 2025We Should Evaluate Real-World Impactcited by 12
  8. 2025Life-Cycle Emissions of AI Hardware: A Cradle-To-Grave Approach and Generational Trendscited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.