Out-of-Distribution Detection in LiDAR Semantic Segmentation Using Epistemic Uncertainty from Hierarchical GMMs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In addition to accurate scene understanding through precise semantic segmentation of LiDAR point clouds, detecting out-of-distribution (OOD) objects, instances not encountered during training, is essential to prevent the incorrect assignment of unknown objects to known classes. While supervised OOD detection methods depend on auxiliary OOD datasets, unsupervised methods avoid this requirement but typically rely on predictive entropy, the entropy of the predictive distribution obtained by averaging over an ensemble or multiple posterior weight samples. However, these methods often conflate epistemic (model) and aleatoric (data) uncertainties, misclassifying ambiguous in distribution regions as OOD. To address this issue, we present an unsupervised OOD detection approach that employs epistemic uncertainty derived from hierarchical Bayesian modeling of Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) parameters in the feature space of a deep neural network. Without requiring auxiliary data or additional training stages, our approach outperforms existing uncertainty-based methods on the SemanticKITTI dataset, achieving an 18% improvement in AUROC, 22% increase in AUPRC, and 36% reduction in FPR95 (from 76% to 40%), compared to the predictive entropy approach used in prior works.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2025.
Builds on
22 of 29 references.
References · 22
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
- 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,385
- 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,170
- 2018A Simple Unified Framework for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samples and Adversarial Attackscited by 1,485
- 2017Enhancing The Reliability of Out-of-distribution Image Detection in Neural Networkscited by 1,328
- 2018Deep Anomaly Detection with Outlier Exposurecited by 942
- 2014Deep Neural Networks are Easily Fooled: High Confidence Predictions for Unrecognizable Imagescited by 776
- 2019Using Self-Supervised Learning Can Improve Model Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 514
- 2021Revisiting the Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 390
- 2020SalsaNext: Fast, Uncertainty-aware Semantic Segmentation of LiDAR Point Clouds for Autonomous Drivingcited by 226
- 2018To Trust Or Not To Trust A Classifiercited by 207
10 more
- 2018Understanding Measures of Uncertainty for Adversarial Example Detectioncited by 177
- 2021Pixel-wise Anomaly Detection in Complex Driving Scenescited by 109
- 2022GMMSeg: Gaussian Mixture based Generative Semantic Segmentation Modelscited by 87
- 2019Simultaneous Semantic Segmentation and Outlier Detection in Presence of Domain Shiftcited by 54
- 2018Discriminative out-of-distribution detection for semantic segmentationcited by 47
- 2024PixOOD: Pixel-Level Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 20
- 2022Out-of-Distribution Detection for LiDAR-based 3D Object Detectioncited by 17
- 2021Fool Me Once: Robust Selective Segmentation via Out-of-Distribution Detection with Contrastive Learningcited by 9
- 2022Heatmap-based Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 9
- 2024Uncertainty Estimation and Out-of-Distribution Detection for LiDAR Scene Semantic Segmentationcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.