Efficient Prompt Optimisation for Legal Text Classification with Proxy Prompt Evaluator
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Prompt optimization aims to systematically refine prompts to enhance a language model's performance on specific tasks. Fairness detection in Terms of Service (ToS) clauses is a challenging legal NLP task that demands carefully crafted prompts to ensure reliable results. However, existing prompt optimization methods are often computationally expensive due to inefficient search strategies and costly prompt candidate scoring. In this paper, we propose a framework that combines Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) with a proxy prompt evaluator to more effectively explore the prompt space while reducing evaluation costs. Experiments demonstrate that our approach achieves higher classification accuracy and efficiency than baseline methods under a constrained computation budget.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Oct 2025.
Builds on
11 of 24 references.
References · 11
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
- 2023Automatic Prompt Optimization with "Gradient Descent" and Beam Searchcited by 653
- 2023PromptAgent: Strategic Planning with Language Models Enables Expert-level Prompt Optimizationcited by 233
- 2024Does Prompt Formatting Have Any Impact on LLM Performance?cited by 141
- 2024The Butterfly Effect of Altering Prompts: How Small Changes and Jailbreaks Affect Large Language Model Performancecited by 100
- 2018CLAUDETTE: an Automated Detector of Potentially Unfair Clauses in Online Terms of Servicecited by 73
- 2024Efficient multi-prompt evaluation of LLMscited by 73
- 2025Self-Supervised Prompt Optimizationcited by 37
- 2025System Prompt Optimization with Meta-Learningcited by 18
- 2025Fast Proxies for LLM Robustness Evaluationcited by 3
- 2022Attack on Unfair ToS Clause Detection: A Case Study using Universal Adversarial Triggerscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.