SliceFine: The Universal Winning-Slice Hypothesis for Pretrained Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper presents a theoretical framework explaining why fine tuning small, randomly selected subnetworks (slices) within pre trained models can be sufficient for downstream adaptation. We prove that pretrained networks exhibit a universal winning slice property arising from two phenomena: (1) spectral balance the eigenspectra of different weight matrix slices are remarkably similar; and (2) high task energy their backbone representations retain rich, task relevant features. This leads to the Universal Winning Slice Hypothesis, which provides a theoretical foundation for parameter efficient fine tuning (PEFT) in large scale models. Inspired by this, we propose SliceFine, a PEFT method that exploits this inherent redundancy by updating only selected slices of the original weights introducing zero new parameters, unlike adapter-based approaches. Empirically, SliceFine matches the performance of state of the art PEFT methods across language and vision tasks, while significantly improving training speed, memory efficiency, and model compactness. Our work bridges theory and practice, offering a theoretically grounded alternative to existing PEFT techniques.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 60 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Oct 2025.
Builds on
60 of 68 references.
References · 60
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
- 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,236
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
- 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,915
- 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,795
- 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,883
38 more
- 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,262
- 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,183
- 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,164
- 2017The Kinetics Human Action Video Datasetcited by 1,909
- 2025Gemma 3 Technical Reportcited by 1,824
- 2020Don't Stop Pretraining: Adapt Language Models to Domains and Taskscited by 1,565
- 2022VideoMAE: Masked Autoencoders are Data-Efficient Learners for Self-Supervised Video Pre-Trainingcited by 1,322
- 2021BitFit: Simple Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning for Transformer-based Masked Language-modelscited by 1,245
- 2023SparseGPT: Massive Language Models Can Be Accurately Pruned in One-Shotcited by 1,121
- 2022Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context Learningcited by 896
- 2021Are NLP Models really able to Solve Simple Math Word Problems?cited by 878
- 2021Towards a Unified View of Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learningcited by 872
- 2023A Simple and Effective Pruning Approach for Large Language Modelscited by 800
- 2024DoRA: Weight-Decomposed Low-Rank Adaptationcited by 758
- 2023LLM-Pruner: On the Structural Pruning of Large Language Modelscited by 650
- 2019A Large-scale Study of Representation Learning with the Visual Task Adaptation Benchmarkcited by 425
- 2024LoRA+: Efficient Low Rank Adaptation of Large Modelscited by 377
- 2016Solving General Arithmetic Word Problemscited by 360
- 2020Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning with Diff Pruningcited by 352
- 2020Visual Transformers: Token-based Image Representation and Processing for Computer Visioncited by 334
- 2023LLM-Adapters: An Adapter Family for Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning of Large Language Modelscited by 324
- 2023VeRA: Vector-based Random Matrix Adaptationcited by 300
- 2020The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis for Pre-trained BERT Networkscited by 275
- 2019What's Hidden in a Randomly Weighted Neural Network?cited by 237
- 2020Proving the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Pruning is All You Needcited by 201
- 2021FedPara: Low-Rank Hadamard Product for Communication-Efficient Federated Learningcited by 141
- 2023LoRA-FA: Efficient and Effective Low Rank Representation Fine-tuningcited by 137
- 2022KronA: Parameter Efficient Tuning with Kronecker Adaptercited by 133
- 2020When BERT Plays the Lottery, All Tickets Are Winningcited by 114
- 2020The Lottery Tickets Hypothesis for Supervised and Self-supervised Pre-training in Computer Vision Modelscited by 91
- 2020Optimal Lottery Tickets via SubsetSum: Logarithmic Over-Parameterization is Sufficientcited by 81
- 2024LoRA-XS: Low-Rank Adaptation with Extremely Small Number of Parameterscited by 76
- 2023Tuning LayerNorm in Attention: Towards Efficient Multi-Modal LLM Finetuningcited by 64
- 2021How Well Do Sparse Imagenet Models Transfer?cited by 50
- 2024Mixture-of-Subspaces in Low-Rank Adaptationcited by 47
- 2021Early-Bird GCNs: Graph-Network Co-Optimization Towards More Efficient GCN Training and Inference via Drawing Early-Bird Lottery Ticketscited by 27
- 2022Dual Lottery Ticket Hypothesiscited by 27
- 2024Scaling Sparse Fine-Tuning to Large Language Modelscited by 26
50 most cited of 60 All 60 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.