mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Biology-driven assessment of deep learning super-resolution imaging of the porosity network in dentin

arXiv 2510.08407 ↗First posted 9 Oct 2025cs.LG cs.CV q-bio.TOcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The mechanosensory system of teeth is currently believed to partly rely on Odontoblast cells stimulation by fluid flow through a porosity network extending through dentin. Visualizing the smallest sub-microscopic porosity vessels therefore requires the highest achievable resolution from confocal fluorescence microscopy, the current gold standard. This considerably limits the extent of the field of view to very small sample regions. To overcome this limitation, we tested different deep learning (DL) super-resolution (SR) models to allow faster experimental acquisitions of lower resolution images and restore optimal image quality by post-processing. Three supervised 2D SR models (RCAN, pix2pix, FSRCNN) and one unsupervised (CycleGAN) were applied to a unique set of experimentally paired high- and low-resolution confocal images acquired with different sampling schemes, resulting in a pixel size increase of x2, x4, x8. Model performance was quantified using a broad set of similarity and distribution-based image quality assessment (IQA) metrics, which yielded inconsistent results that mostly contradicted our visual perception. This raises the question of the relevance of such generic metrics to efficiently target the specific structure of dental porosity. To resolve this conflicting information, the generated SR images were segmented taking into account the specific scales and morphology of the porosity network and analysed by comparing connected components. Additionally, the capacity of the SR models to preserve 3D porosity connectivity throughout the confocal image stacks was evaluated using graph analysis. This biology-driven assessment allowed a far better mechanistic interpretation of SR performance, highlighting differences in model sensitivity to weak intensity features and the impact of non-linearity in image generation, which explains the failure of standard IQA metrics.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Oct 2025.

Builds on

19 of 55 references.

References · 19

  1. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
  2. 2016Image-to-Image Translation with Conditional Adversarial Networkscited by 4,510
  3. 2016Improved Techniques for Training GANscited by 2,938
  4. 2016Photo-Realistic Single Image Super-Resolution Using a Generative Adversarial Networkcited by 1,898
  5. 2018Demystifying MMD GANscited by 1,268
  6. 2018Image Super-Resolution Using Very Deep Residual Channel Attention Networkscited by 1,256
  7. 2018ESRGAN: Enhanced Super-Resolution Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 1,250
  8. 2014Image Super-Resolution Using Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 1,218
  9. 2015Accurate Image Super-Resolution Using Very Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 902
  10. 2016TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Distributed Systemscited by 660
  11. 2017Towards Principled Methods for Training Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 460
  12. 2016Accelerating the Super-Resolution Convolutional Neural Networkcited by 393
7 more
  1. 2016EnhanceNet: Single Image Super-Resolution Through Automated Texture Synthesiscited by 177
  2. 2018Deep Learning for Single Image Super-Resolution: A Brief Reviewcited by 158
  3. 2016A Haar Wavelet-Based Perceptual Similarity Index for Image Quality Assessmentcited by 57
  4. 2018Geometry Score: A Method For Comparing Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 56
  5. 2022PyTorch Image Quality: Metrics for Image Quality Assessmentcited by 34
  6. 2018Unpaired Brain MR-to-CT Synthesis using a Structure-Constrained CycleGANcited by 31
  7. 2022FakeNews: GAN-based generation of realistic 3D volumetric data -- A systematic review and taxonomycited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.