Beyond Grid-Locked Voxels: Neural Response Functions for Continuous Brain Encoding
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Neural encoding models aim to predict fMRI-measured brain responses to natural images. fMRI data is acquired as a 3D volume of voxels, where each voxel has a defined spatial location in the brain. However, conventional encoding models often flatten this volume into a 1D vector and treat voxel responses as independent outputs. This removes spatial context, discards anatomical information, and ties each model to a subject-specific voxel grid. We introduce the Neural Response Function (NRF), a framework that models fMRI activity as a continuous function over anatomical space rather than a flat vector of voxels. NRF represents brain activity as a continuous implicit function: given an image and a spatial coordinate (x, y, z) in standardized MNI space, the model predicts the response at that location. This formulation decouples predictions from the training grid, supports querying at arbitrary spatial resolutions, and enables resolution-agnostic analyses. By grounding the model in anatomical space, NRF exploits two key properties of brain responses: (1) local smoothness -- neighboring voxels exhibit similar response patterns; modeling responses continuously captures these correlations and improves data efficiency, and (2) cross-subject alignment -- MNI coordinates unify data across individuals, allowing a model pretrained on one subject to be fine-tuned on new subjects. In experiments, NRF outperformed baseline models in both intrasubject encoding and cross-subject adaptation, achieving high performance while reducing the data size needed by orders of magnitude. To our knowledge, NRF is the first anatomically aware encoding model to move beyond flattened voxels, learning a continuous mapping from images to brain responses in 3D space.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2025.
Builds on
16 of 37 references.
References · 16
- 2019DeepSDF: Learning Continuous Signed Distance Functions for Shape Representationcited by 2,682
- 2020Implicit Neural Representations with Periodic Activation Functionscited by 2,214
- 2020Fourier Features Let Networks Learn High Frequency Functions in Low Dimensional Domainscited by 2,170
- 2018Occupancy Networks: Learning 3D Reconstruction in Function Spacecited by 2,037
- 2018Learning Implicit Fields for Generative Shape Modelingcited by 1,060
- 2024MindEye2: Shared-Subject Models Enable fMRI-To-Image With 1 Hour of Datacited by 105
- 2014Deep Neural Networks Reveal a Gradient in the Complexity of Neural Representations across the Brain's Ventral Visual Pathwaycited by 93
- 2019From voxels to pixels and back: Self-supervision in natural-image reconstruction from fMRIcited by 67
- 2024MindBridge: A Cross-Subject Brain Decoding Frameworkcited by 65
- 2023Brain encoding models based on multimodal transformers can transfer across language and visioncited by 31
- 2023Brain Diffusion for Visual Exploration: Cortical Discovery using Large Scale Generative Modelscited by 29
- 2024The Wisdom of a Crowd of Brains: A Universal Brain Encodercited by 15
4 more
- 2025MindSimulator: Exploring Brain Concept Localization via Synthetic FMRIcited by 15
- 2025MindLLM: A Subject-Agnostic and Versatile Model for fMRI-to-Text Decodingcited by 14
- 2022Personalized visual encoding model construction with small datacited by 12
- 2025Transformer brain encoders explain human high-level visual responsescited by 10
Built on by
Not cited yet.