mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Self-signals Driven Multi-LLM Debate for Efficient and Accurate Reasoning

arXiv 2510.06843 ↗First posted 8 Oct 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 1

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning for agents, planning and code

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) have exhibited impressive capabilities across diverse application domains. Recent work has explored Multi-LLM Agent Debate (MAD) as a way to enhance performance by enabling multiple LLMs to discuss and refine responses iteratively. Nevertheless, existing MAD methods predominantly focus on utilizing external structures, such as debate graphs, using LLM-as-a-Judge, while neglecting the application of self signals, such as token logits and attention, that arise during generation. This omission leads to redundant computation and potential performance degradation. In this paper, we shift the focus to the self signals of multi-LLM debate and introduce a Self-Signals Driven Multi-LLM Debate (SID), which leverages two types of self-signals: model-level confidence and token-level semantic focus, to adaptively guide the debate process. Our approach enables high-confidence agents to exit early at the model level and compress the redundant debate contents based on the attention mechanism. We evaluate our method on various LLMs and Multimodal LLMs across multiple challenging benchmarks. Experimental results demonstrate that our method not only outperforms existing MAD techniques in accuracy but also reduces token consumption, highlighting the effectiveness of utilizing self signals in enhancing both the performance and efficiency of multi-agent debate systems. Our code will be available at~hrefhttps://github.com/xuhang2019/SIDtexttthttps://github.com/xuhang2019/SID.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 25 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2025.

Builds on

25 of 42 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024GroupDebate: Enhancing the Efficiency of Multi-Agent Debate Using Group Discussion21 Sep
  2. 2024Improving Multi-Agent Debate with Sparse Communication Topology17 Jun
  3. 2023Encouraging Divergent Thinking in Large Language Models through Multi-Agent Debate30 May

Other references · 22

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  3. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  4. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
  5. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
  6. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
  7. 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Modelscited by 3,211
  8. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
  9. 2023Efficient Streaming Language Models with Attention Sinkscited by 2,186
  10. 2022Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question Answeringcited by 1,919
  11. 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,848
  12. 2025gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Cardcited by 1,386
10 more
  1. 2024Are We on the Right Way for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models?cited by 914
  2. 2023Just Ask for Calibration: Strategies for Eliciting Calibrated Confidence Scores from Language Models Fine-Tuned with Human Feedbackcited by 812
  3. 2025GLM-4.5V and GLM-4.1V-Thinking: Towards Versatile Multimodal Reasoning with Scalable Reinforcement Learningcited by 466
  4. 2024LLMs-as-Judges: A Comprehensive Survey on LLM-based Evaluation Methodscited by 465
  5. 2023Take a Step Back: Evoking Reasoning via Abstraction in Large Language Modelscited by 159
  6. 2024Self-Contrast: Better Reflection Through Inconsistent Solving Perspectivescited by 71
  7. 2023Uncertainty in Natural Language Processing: Sources, Quantification, and Applicationscited by 44
  8. 2025Position: Uncertainty Quantification Needs Reassessment for Large-language Model Agentscited by 32
  9. 2025Overconfidence in LLM-as-a-Judge: Diagnosis and Confidence-Driven Solutioncited by 18
  10. 2025Retrv-R1: A Reasoning-Driven MLLM Framework for Universal and Efficient Multimodal Retrievalcited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023Should we be going MAD? A Look at Multi-Agent Debate Strategies for LLMs
  2. 2025S2-MAD: Breaking the Token Barrier to Enhance Multi-Agent Debate Efficiency
  3. 2025iMAD: Intelligent Multi-Agent Debate for Efficient and Accurate LLM Inference
  4. 2025Can LLM Agents Really Debate? A Controlled Study of Multi-Agent Debate in Logical Reasoning
  5. 2025Debate Only When Necessary: Adaptive Multiagent Collaboration for Efficient LLM Reasoning
  6. 2026Multi-Agent Debate with Memory Masking
  7. 2025Beyond Single Models: Enhancing LLM Detection of Ambiguity in Requests through Debate
  8. 2026Statistical Scouting Finds Debate-Safe but Not Debate-Useful Cases: A Matched-Ceiling Study of Open-Weight LLM Reasoning Protocols