AISysRev -- LLM-based Tool for Title-abstract Screening
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Conducting systematic reviews is laborious. In the screening or study selection phase, the number of papers can be overwhelming. Recent research has demonstrated that large language models (LLMs) can perform title-abstract screening and support humans in the task. To this end, we developed AISysRev, an LLM-based screening tool implemented as a containerized web application. The tool accepts CSV files containing paper titles and abstracts. Users specify inclusion and exclusion criteria. Multiple different LLMs can be used, such as Gemini, Claude, Mistral or ChatGPT via OpenRouter. We also support locally hosted models and any model compatible with the OpenAI SDK. AISysRev implements both zero-shot and few-shot prompting, and also allows for manual screening through interfaces that display LLM results as guidance for human reviewers. LLM calls are parallelized, meaning screening speed is typically between 100 to 300 papers per minute, depending on the model and the host. To demonstrate the tool's use in practice, we conducted a qualitative trial study with 137 papers using the tool. Our findings indicate that papers can be classified into four categories: Easy Includes, Easy Excludes, Boundary Includes, and Boundary Excludes. The Boundary cases, where LLMs are prone to errors, highlight the need for human intervention. While LLMs do not replace human judgment in systematic reviews, they can reduce the burden of assessing large volumes of scientific literature. Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HeblemlgnAQ Tool: https://github.com/EvoTestOps/AISysRev
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2025.
Builds on
6 of 29 references.
References · 6
- 2020Open Source Software for Efficient and Transparent Reviewscited by 35
- 2024The Promise and Challenges of Using LLMs to Accelerate the Screening Process of Systematic Reviewscited by 14
- 2019Time Pressure in Software Engineering: A Systematic Reviewcited by 8
- 2025SESR-Eval: Dataset for Evaluating LLMs in the Title-Abstract Screening of Systematic Reviewscited by 7
- 2025DenseReviewer: A Screening Prioritisation Tool for Systematic Review based on Dense Retrievalcited by 2
- 2025AiReview: An Open Platform for Accelerating Systematic Reviews with LLMscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026TiAb Review Plugin: A Browser-Based Tool for AI-Assisted Study Selection in Systematic Reviewscited by 0
- 2026Understanding LLMs in Title-Abstract Screening: From Disagreements to Recommendationscited by 0
- 2026Preliminary Guidelines for Using and Evaluating GenAI Tools to Support Systematic Literature Reviewscited by 0
- 2026SurveyReview: A Reviewer-Aligned Benchmark for Survey Evaluatorscited by 0
- 2026SurveyReview: A Reviewer-Aligned Benchmark for Survey Evaluators7 Aug 2026
- 2026Preliminary Guidelines for Using and Evaluating GenAI Tools to Support Systematic Literature Reviews27 Jul 2026
- 2026Understanding LLMs in Title-Abstract Screening: From Disagreements to Recommendations16 Jun 2026
- 2026TiAb Review Plugin: A Browser-Based Tool for AI-Assisted Study Selection in Systematic Reviews8 Apr 2026