mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Inductive inference of gradient-boosted decision trees on graphs for insurance fraud detection

arXiv 2510.05676 ↗First posted 7 Oct 2025cs.LG cs.SIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Graph-based methods are becoming increasingly popular in machine learning due to their ability to model complex data and relations. Insurance fraud is a prime use case, since fraudulent claims are often the result of organised criminals that stage accidents or the same persons filing erroneous claims on multiple policies. One challenge is that graph-based approaches struggle to find meaningful representations of the data because of the high class imbalance present in fraud data. In addition, insurance graphs are heterogeneous and dynamic, given the changing relations among people, companies and policies. As a result, gradient-boosted tree approaches on tabular data still dominate the field. Therefore, we present a novel inductive graph gradient boosting machine (G-GBM) for supervised learning on heterogeneous and dynamic graphs. G-GBM combines the class-imbalance robustness of gradient boosting with heterogeneous graph information encoded through interpretable path-level feature concatenations, while preserving access to the original tabular feature space. In addition, the explicit representation of neighbourhood information enables transparent SHAP-based explanations at the metapath and feature level. We demonstrate G-GBM for insurance fraud detection on an open-source and a real-world, proprietary dataset, and find that G-GBM performs on par or better than the state-of-the-art. The associated insurance fraud dataset is publicly released to facilitate reproducibility.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2025.

Builds on

22 of 67 references.

References · 22

  1. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
  2. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  3. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
  4. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  5. 2019Fast Graph Representation Learning with PyTorch Geometriccited by 2,434
  6. 2016node2vec: Scalable Feature Learning for Networkscited by 1,918
  7. 2017Modeling Relational Data with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 1,694
  8. 2014DeepWalk: Online Learning of Social Representationscited by 1,547
  9. 2018Deeper Insights into Graph Convolutional Networks for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,102
  10. 2019Heterogeneous Graph Attention Networkcited by 734
  11. 2020Heterogeneous Graph Transformercited by 582
  12. 2021Tabular Data: Deep Learning is Not All You Needcited by 535
10 more
  1. 2017Representation Learning on Graphs: Methods and Applicationscited by 457
  2. 2020MAGNN: Metapath Aggregated Graph Neural Network for Heterogeneous Graph Embeddingcited by 304
  3. 2021Are we really making much progress? Revisiting, benchmarking, and refining heterogeneous graph neural networkscited by 176
  4. 2015A Survey of Heterogeneous Information Network Analysiscited by 110
  5. 2025PyG 2.0: Scalable Learning on Real World Graphscited by 52
  6. 2020Machine learning methods to detect money laundering in the Bitcoin blockchain in the presence of label scarcitycited by 21
  7. 2020Social network analytics for supervised fraud detection in insurancecited by 7
  8. 2024Network Analytics for Anti-Money Laundering -- A Systematic Literature Review and Experimental Evaluationcited by 7
  9. 2020InfDetect: a Large Scale Graph-based Fraud Detection System for E-Commerce Insurancecited by 3
  10. 2023An engine to simulate insurance fraud network datacited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.