Social network analytics for supervised fraud detection in insurance
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Insurance fraud occurs when policyholders file claims that are exaggerated or based on intentional damages. This contribution develops a fraud detection strategy by extracting insightful information from the social network of a claim. First, we construct a network by linking claims with all their involved parties, including the policyholders, brokers, experts, and garages. Next, we establish fraud as a social phenomenon in the network and use the BiRank algorithm with a fraud specific query vector to compute a fraud score for each claim. From the network, we extract features related to the fraud scores as well as the claims' neighborhood structure. Finally, we combine these network features with the claim-specific features and build a supervised model with fraud in motor insurance as the target variable. Although we build a model for only motor insurance, the network includes claims from all available lines of business. Our results show that models with features derived from the network perform well when detecting fraud and even outperform the models using only the classical claim-specific features. Combining network and claim-specific features further improves the performance of supervised learning models to detect fraud. The resulting model flags highly suspicions claims that need to be further investigated. Our approach provides a guided and intelligent selection of claims and contributes to a more effective fraud investigation process.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 Sep 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
7 papers.
- 2022Influencer Detection with Dynamic Graph Neural Networkscited by 3
- 2023INFLECT-DGNN: Influencer Prediction with Dynamic Graph Neural Networkscited by 1
- 2023An engine to simulate insurance fraud network datacited by 1
- 2025Advances in Continual Graph Learning for Anti-Money Laundering Systems: A Comprehensive Reviewcited by 0
- 2025Consistency of Selection Strategies for Fraud Detectioncited by 0
- 2025Inductive inference of gradient-boosted decision trees on graphs for insurance fraud detectioncited by 0
- 2026Revealing Geography-Driven Signals in Zone-Level Claim Frequency Models: An Empirical Study using Environmental and Visual Predictorscited by 0
- 2026Revealing Geography-Driven Signals in Zone-Level Claim Frequency Models: An Empirical Study using Environmental and Visual Predictors23 Apr 2026
- 2025Inductive inference of gradient-boosted decision trees on graphs for insurance fraud detection7 Oct 2025
- 2025Consistency of Selection Strategies for Fraud Detection23 Sep 2025
- 2025Advances in Continual Graph Learning for Anti-Money Laundering Systems: A Comprehensive Review31 Mar 2025
- 2023An engine to simulate insurance fraud network data21 Aug 2023
- 2023INFLECT-DGNN: Influencer Prediction with Dynamic Graph Neural Networks16 Jul 2023
- 2022Influencer Detection with Dynamic Graph Neural Networks15 Nov 2022