TeachLM: Post-Training LLMs for Education Using Authentic Learning Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The promise of generative AI to revolutionize education is constrained by the pedagogical limits of large language models (LLMs). A major issue is the lack of access to high-quality training data that reflect the learning of actual students. Prompt engineering has emerged as a stopgap, but the ability of prompts to encode complex pedagogical strategies in rule-based natural language is inherently limited. To address this gap we introduce TeachLM - an LLM optimized for teaching through parameter-efficient fine-tuning of state-of-the-art models. TeachLM is trained on a dataset comprised of 100,000 hours of one-on-one, longitudinal student-tutor interactions maintained by Polygence, which underwent a rigorous anonymization process to protect privacy. We use parameter-efficient fine-tuning to develop an authentic student model that enables the generation of high-fidelity synthetic student-tutor dialogues. Building on this capability, we propose a novel multi-turn evaluation protocol that leverages synthetic dialogue generation to provide fast, scalable, and reproducible assessments of the dialogical capabilities of LLMs. Our evaluations demonstrate that fine-tuning on authentic learning data significantly improves conversational and pedagogical performance - doubling student talk time, improving questioning style, increasing dialogue turns by 50%, and greater personalization of instruction.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 78 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Oct 2025.
Builds on
23 of 78 references.
References · 23
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
- 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
- 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,124
- 2023Instruction Tuning with GPT-4cited by 676
- 2025MultiChallenge: A Realistic Multi-Turn Conversation Evaluation Benchmark Challenging to Frontier LLMscited by 171
- 2023MathDial: A Dialogue Tutoring Dataset with Rich Pedagogical Properties Grounded in Math Reasoning Problemscited by 128
- 2024Concise Thoughts: Impact of Output Length on LLM Reasoning and Costcited by 108
- 2025Your Brain on ChatGPT: Accumulation of Cognitive Debt when Using an AI Assistant for Essay Writing Taskcited by 103
- 2022The AI Teacher Test: Measuring the Pedagogical Ability of Blender and GPT-3 in Educational Dialoguescited by 78
- 2024MT-Eval: A Multi-Turn Capabilities Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language Modelscited by 78
11 more
- 2024Towards Responsible Development of Generative AI for Education: An Evaluation-Driven Approachcited by 53
- 2024Tutor CoPilot: A Human-AI Approach for Scaling Real-Time Expertisecited by 46
- 2023DARWIN Series: Domain Specific Large Language Models for Natural Sciencecited by 39
- 2022GPT-3-driven pedagogical agents for training children's curious question-asking skillscited by 29
- 2025Embracing Imperfection: Simulating Students with Diverse Cognitive Levels Using LLM-based Agentscited by 19
- 2020The Teacher-Student Chatroom Corpuscited by 17
- 2024On the Implications of Verbose LLM Outputs: A Case Study in Translation Evaluationcited by 13
- 2025Evaluating Gemini in an arena for learningcited by 11
- 2025AetherCode: Evaluating LLMs' Ability to Win In Premier Programming Competitionscited by 10
- 2025Which Type of Students can LLMs Act? Investigating Authentic Simulation with Graph-based Human-AI Collaborative Systemcited by 9
- 2023Assessing the efficacy of large language models in generating accurate teacher responsescited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 7.
8 papers.
- 2026Simulated Students in Tutoring Dialogues: Substance or Illusion?cited by 14
- 2026Evaluating Answer Leakage Robustness of LLM Tutors against Adversarial Student Attackscited by 5
- 2026Who Am I? History-Aware Profiles for Student Simulation in Tutoring Dialoguescited by 2
- 2025Reasoning Trajectories for Socratic Debugging of Student Code: From Misconceptions to Contradictions and Updated Beliefscited by 0
- 2026Application-Driven Pedagogical Knowledge Optimization of Open-Source LLMs via Reinforcement Learning and Supervised Fine-Tuningcited by 0
- 2026EvalConvoLearn: An Open-Source Framework for Evaluating Grounded Learner Simulations in Tutoring Conversationscited by 0
- 2026ADE: Agentic Data Evolution Framework for Human-Centered Objectivescited by 0
- 2026Evaluating Feedback Focus and Pedagogical Adaptivity in LLM-Generated Feedback on Student Writingcited by 0
- 2026Evaluating Feedback Focus and Pedagogical Adaptivity in LLM-Generated Feedback on Student Writing23 Sep 2026
- 2026ADE: Agentic Data Evolution Framework for Human-Centered Objectives24 Aug 2026
- 2026EvalConvoLearn: An Open-Source Framework for Evaluating Grounded Learner Simulations in Tutoring Conversations18 Jun 2026
- 2026Who Am I? History-Aware Profiles for Student Simulation in Tutoring Dialogues28 May 2026
- 2026Evaluating Answer Leakage Robustness of LLM Tutors against Adversarial Student Attacks20 Apr 2026
- 2026Application-Driven Pedagogical Knowledge Optimization of Open-Source LLMs via Reinforcement Learning and Supervised Fine-Tuning7 Apr 2026
- 2026Simulated Students in Tutoring Dialogues: Substance or Illusion?7 Jan 2026
- 2025Reasoning Trajectories for Socratic Debugging of Student Code: From Misconceptions to Contradictions and Updated Beliefs1 Nov 2025