mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Impatient Users Confuse AI Agents: High-fidelity Simulations of Human Traits for Testing Agents

arXiv 2510.04491 ↗First posted 6 Oct 2025cs.AI cs.CLcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Despite rapid progress in building conversational AI agents, robustness is still largely untested. Small shifts in user behavior, such as being more impatient, incoherent, or skeptical, can cause sharp drops in agent performance, revealing how brittle current AI agents are. Today's benchmarks fail to capture this fragility: agents may perform well under standard evaluations but degrade spectacularly in more realistic and varied settings. We address this robustness testing gap by introducing TraitBasis, a lightweight, model-agnostic method for systematically stress testing AI agents. TraitBasis learns directions in activation space corresponding to steerable user traits (e.g., impatience or incoherence), which can be controlled, scaled, composed, and applied at inference time without any fine-tuning or extra data. Using TraitBasis, we extend τ-Bench to τ-Trait, where user behaviors are altered via controlled trait vectors. We observe on average a 2%-30% performance degradation on τ-Trait across frontier models, highlighting the lack of robustness of current AI agents to variations in user behavior. Together, these results highlight both the critical role of robustness testing and the promise of TraitBasis as a simple, data-efficient, and compositional tool. By powering simulation-driven stress tests and training loops, TraitBasis opens the door to building AI agents that remain reliable in the unpredictable dynamics of real-world human interactions. We have open-sourced τ-Trai across four domains: airline, retail, telecom, and telehealth, so the community can systematically QA their agents under realistic, behaviorally diverse intents and trait scenarios: https://github.com/collinear-ai/tau-trait.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 89 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Oct 2025.

Builds on

32 of 89 references.

References · 32

  1. 2023ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIscited by 1,880
  2. 2024τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domainscited by 1,280
  3. 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 928
  4. 2023Steering Language Models With Activation Engineeringcited by 824
  5. 2018Personalizing Dialogue Agents: I have a dog, do you have pets too?cited by 820
  6. 2025τ2-Bench: Evaluating Conversational Agents in a Dual-Control Environmentcited by 558
  7. 2025GLM-4.5: Agentic, Reasoning, and Coding (ARC) Foundation Modelscited by 446
  8. 2025Persona Vectors: Monitoring and Controlling Character Traits in Language Modelscited by 303
  9. 2023In-context Vectors: Making In Context Learning More Effective and Controllable Through Latent Space Steeringcited by 240
  10. 2022Extracting Latent Steering Vectors from Pretrained Language Modelscited by 217
  11. 2023RoleLLM: Benchmarking, Eliciting, and Enhancing Role-Playing Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 173
  12. 2024Quantifying the Persona Effect in LLM Simulationscited by 164
20 more
  1. 2024CharacterEval: A Chinese Benchmark for Role-Playing Conversational Agent Evaluationcited by 139
  2. 2024Large Language Models are Superpositions of All Characters: Attaining Arbitrary Role-play via Self-Alignmentcited by 104
  3. 2025MCP-Bench: Benchmarking Tool-Using LLM Agents with Complex Real-World Tasks via MCP Serverscited by 101
  4. 2024PersonaGym: Evaluating Persona Agents and LLMscited by 89
  5. 2025MCP-Universe: Benchmarking Large Language Models with Real-World Model Context Protocol Serverscited by 89
  6. 2024Democratizing Large Language Models via Personalized Parameter-Efficient Fine-tuningcited by 87
  7. 2024GTA: A Benchmark for General Tool Agentscited by 77
  8. 2025Steering Large Language Model Activations in Sparse Spacescited by 58
  9. 2023When "A Helpful Assistant" Is Not Really Helpful: Personas in System Prompts Do Not Improve Performances of Large Language Modelscited by 50
  10. 2024RoTBench: A Multi-Level Benchmark for Evaluating the Robustness of Large Language Models in Tool Learningcited by 45
  11. 2018Analyzing and Characterizing User Intent in Information-seeking Conversationscited by 36
  12. 2025MCPEval: Automatic MCP-based Deep Evaluation for AI Agent Modelscited by 34
  13. 2024Persona is a Double-edged Sword: Mitigating the Negative Impact of Role-playing Prompts in Zero-shot Reasoning Taskscited by 28
  14. 2025On the Robustness of Agentic Function Callingcited by 17
  15. 2025MCPVerse: An Expansive, Real-World Benchmark for Agentic Tool Usecited by 16
  16. 2025LiveMCP-101: Stress Testing and Diagnosing MCP-enabled Agents on Challenging Queriescited by 15
  17. 2024PERSOMA: PERsonalized SOft ProMpt Adapter Architecture for Personalized Language Promptingcited by 13
  18. 2025Unveiling Language-Specific Features in Large Language Models via Sparse Autoencoderscited by 12
  19. 2025Embedding-to-Prefix: Parameter-Efficient Personalization for Pre-Trained Large Language Modelscited by 10
  20. 2025Designing Role Vectors to Improve LLM Inference Behaviourcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 7.

8 papers.