mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Multi-Agent Collaborative Intelligence: Dual-Dial Control for Reliable LLM Reasoning

arXiv 2510.04488 ↗First posted 6 Oct 2025cs.AI cs.IT math.ITcited by 2

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning for agents, planning and code

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Multi-agent debate often wastes compute by using a fixed adversarial stance, aggregating without deliberation, or stopping on heuristics. We introduce MACI, an active controller with two independent dials that decouple information from behavior: an information dial that gates evidence by quality, and a behavior dial that schedules contentiousness from exploration to consolidation. A moderator tracks disagreement, overlap, evidence quality, and argument quality, and halts when gains plateau. We provide theory-lite guarantees for nonincreasing dispersion and provable termination, with a budget-feasible scheduler. Across clinical diagnosis and news-bias tasks, MACI improves accuracy and calibration while reducing tokens, and converts residual uncertainty into precision RAG plans that specify what to retrieve next. We use a cross-family LLM judge (CRIT) as a conservative soft weight and stop signal, validated for order invariance and judge-swap stability; stability depends on using high-capability judges. MACI turns debate into a budget-aware, measurable, and provably terminating controller.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 12 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Oct 2025.

Builds on

12 of 39 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Debate or Vote: Which Yields Better Decisions in Multi-Agent Large Language Models?24 Aug
  2. 2024Mixture-of-Agents Enhances Large Language Model Capabilities7 Jun

Other references · 10

  1. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
  2. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
  3. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 3,961
  4. 2025Why Do Multi-Agent LLM Systems Fail?cited by 559
  5. 2018AI safety via debatecited by 384
  6. 2023Progressive-Hint Prompting Improves Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 147
  7. 2024On scalable oversight with weak LLMs judging strong LLMscited by 94
  8. 2025Rethinking Mixture-of-Agents: Is Mixing Different Large Language Models Beneficial?cited by 52
  9. 2023Prompting Large Language Models With the Socratic Methodcited by 43
  10. 2023A Closer Look at the Self-Verification Abilities of Large Language Models in Logical Reasoningcited by 41

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026From Debate to Deliberation: Structured Collective Reasoning with Typed Epistemic Acts
  2. 2025iMAD: Intelligent Multi-Agent Debate for Efficient and Accurate LLM Inference
  3. 2026The Reasoning Trap: An Information-Theoretic Bound on Closed-System Multi-Step LLM Reasoning
  4. 2025Debate Only When Necessary: Adaptive Multiagent Collaboration for Efficient LLM Reasoning
  5. 2026The Confident Liar: Diagnosing Multi-Agent Debate with Log-Probabilities and LLM-as-Judge
  6. 2026Consilience: Conformally Calibrated Communication Control for Hidden-Profile Multi-Agent Reasoning
  7. 2026Mixture of Debaters: Learn to Debate at Architectural Level in Multi-Agent Reasoning
  8. 2026Early-Token Confidence Predicts Reasoning Quality in Multi-Agent LLM Debate