mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Reasoning-based Anomaly Detection Framework: A Real-time, Scalable, and Automated Approach to Anomaly Detection Across Domains

arXiv 2510.03486 ↗First posted 3 Oct 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Detecting anomalies in large, distributed systems presents several challenges. The first challenge arises from the sheer volume of data that needs to be processed. Flagging anomalies in a high-throughput environment calls for a careful consideration of both algorithm and system design. The second challenge comes from the heterogeneity of time-series datasets that leverage such a system in production. In practice, anomaly detection systems are rarely deployed for a single use case. Typically, there are several metrics to monitor, often across several domains (e.g. engineering, business and operations). A one-size-fits-all approach rarely works, so these systems need to be fine-tuned for every application - this is often done manually. The third challenge comes from the fact that determining the root-cause of anomalies in such settings is akin to finding a needle in a haystack. Identifying (in real time) a time-series dataset that is associated causally with the anomalous time-series data is a very difficult problem. In this paper, we describe a unified framework that addresses these challenges. Reasoning based Anomaly Detection Framework (RADF) is designed to perform real time anomaly detection on very large datasets. This framework employs a novel technique (mSelect) that automates the process of algorithm selection and hyper-parameter tuning for each use case. Finally, it incorporates a post-detection capability that allows for faster triaging and root-cause determination. Our extensive experiments demonstrate that RADF, powered by mSelect, surpasses state-of-the-art anomaly detection models in AUC performance for 5 out of 9 public benchmarking datasets. RADF achieved an AUC of over 0.85 for 7 out of 9 datasets, a distinction unmatched by any other state-of-the-art model.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2025.

Builds on

16 of 62 references.

References · 16

  1. 2015Causal inference using invariant prediction: identification and confidence intervalscited by 533
  2. 2022ADBench: Anomaly Detection Benchmarkcited by 230
  3. 2017A Multimodal Anomaly Detector for Robot-Assisted Feeding Using an LSTM-based Variational Autoencodercited by 209
  4. 2020DYNOTEARS: Structure Learning from Time-Series Datacited by 198
  5. 2020Discovering contemporaneous and lagged causal relations in autocorrelated nonlinear time series datasetscited by 136
  6. 2022Anomalib: A Deep Learning Library for Anomaly Detectioncited by 75
  7. 2022ADATIME: A Benchmarking Suite for Domain Adaptation on Time Series Datacited by 45
  8. 2020TODS: An Automated Time Series Outlier Detection Systemcited by 41
  9. 2016Multivariate Industrial Time Series with Cyber-Attack Simulation: Fault Detection Using an LSTM-based Predictive Data Modelcited by 33
  10. 2017Automatic Anomaly Detection in the Cloud Via Statistical Learningcited by 25
  11. 2022Toward Unsupervised Outlier Model Selectioncited by 18
  12. 2020Variable-lag Granger Causality and Transfer Entropy for Time Series Analysiscited by 9
4 more
  1. 2020Automated Model Selection for Time-Series Anomaly Detectioncited by 9
  2. 2022Meta-Learning for Unsupervised Outlier Detection with Optimal Transportcited by 5
  3. 2023When Graph Neural Network Meets Causality: Opportunities, Methodologies and An Outlookcited by 4
  4. 2024Efficient algorithms for the sensitivities of the Pearson correlation coefficient and its statistical significance to online datacited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.